
Originally Posted by
DCRich
ok, I can't help it. gotta give my 2cents on this matter as well. While the PSX was originally an add-on CD for SNES. The fact that Nintendo basically scrapped it goes to show how little vision they have for the future.
As far as what is needed for a system to fully succeed, things like online play and hdd are essential in todays market. Without online, a home console will surely not be successful. And the fact that Nintendo's target audience are kids shows their lack of knowledge in the industry. Being that majority of game players are those that grew up with the NES, that age group is basically 20 to 35.
Now, while I do like the micro. I may even buy one. But seriously, it's nothing new. No work is needed for that particular system to succeed. It is simply a re-design of an ancient system, aside from the GBA stuff. No different than the release of the PSTwo.
Nintendo was once a great company....but I fear that unless they mature, they will surely fade.
And, lockethevaliant, for you to call gamers of today noobs....honestly now, that makes you sound quite childish. I have been playing games for over 20 years, and think that power is important in a console, although not the only thing. The games are ultimately what make or break a console. But, if a system does not have the hardware to handle what is needed for a great game in todays standards, it will fail.
Just to add another point, I always thought that the sega master was far superior to the NES, but poor marketing killed it. It was technically better, and I kinda wish sega would still make systems.
Bookmarks