i dont really use kxploit anymore, i use the 1.00 one which can run on custom firmware as well, so i dunno because the 1.50 firmware people are numbering
StrmnNrmn posted this on his site:
I'm interested in which firmware everyone is running on. It would be very helpful if you could reply to this post with a) which model of PSP you're using ('fat'/slim, revision # if known) and b) which firmware you're using.
I have two PSPs. I have an original Japanese PSP with v1.00 firmware which I use for development, and a UK PSP which usually runs the latest official firmware (v3.72 at the moment.)
I'm interested because I want to know if anyone still requires the v1.50 (kxploit) versions of Daedalus that I release. I also need to figure out if it's worth my time getting a slim PSP for developing with the v3.xx+ firmware.
Thanks!
-StrmnNrmn
I do wish i had never updated my v1.0 PSP![]()
i dont really use kxploit anymore, i use the 1.00 one which can run on custom firmware as well, so i dunno because the 1.50 firmware people are numbering
All my PSP's run 3.71M33-2 or 3.52M33-4
3.40 OE for me
i would say port to 3.xx kernel for slim users. i current uses the latest cfw, 3.71 m33-3. i also use the 1.0 kernel build of daedalus.
lol....
i still run 1.5 POC-2, though it really does seem like the 1.5 people are numbering lately -_-
however, even if your a 1.5 person, POC-2 enables 1.0 eboot's as well as recovery type menu. so there is really no excuse not to be able to run 1.0 eboots on any firmware....lol
Thanks for Everything,
PSPdemon
404 Error: This signature is missing!
Slim/3.71 m33-3 for me.
Right now, I'm on 3.52 M33-4.
But soon, I will be updating to 3.71 M33-3![]()
3.71 M33-3 Slim here, and so you know. 3.71 M33-3 Phat has 1.00 kernel + 1.50 Kernel + 3.71 Kernel. You would leave nobody out because anyone to stay at 1.50 is missing out.. 1.50 is old news and is obsolete.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks