PDA

View Full Version : Saitek X65F 'stick Requires Only the Subtlest of Touches for a Smooth Flight [Joystic



retroremakes
January 10th, 2010, 17:20
Much like the multi-million dollar jet systems that inspired it, the Saitek Pro Flight X65F joystick/throttle system for PCs doesn't move at all. That's right, not an inch, and yet the controls were compared to mind control. [ars technica (http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2010/01/flight-sticks-for-pc-gaming.ars)]
http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/01/stick1.jpgThe X65F uses "force sensing" tech, just like military planes today. In layman's terms, that means no moving parts.
http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/01/stick2.jpgApply subtle pressure to the 'stick, and your plane banks and turns on a dime.
http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/01/stick3.jpg Twist the controller for precise rudder control, writes ars technica, and then before you know it the joystick is performing almost like an extension of your hand.
http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_throttle1.jpgDual engine control for games that support it, or lock them together for games that don't.
http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_throttle2.jpgSaitek claims that with the X65F there are 608 possible commands a player can issue without ever taking their hands off the controls.
http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_throttle3.jpgAnd while the X65F won't cost you millions, it certainly isn't cheap at $400. This is not including the optional "Saitek Pro Flight Instrument Panels" that you can bolt on the back for a crazy amount of realism. [Saitek (http://www.saitek.com/uk/prod/x65f.htm) via ars technica (http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2010/01/flight-sticks-for-pc-gaming.ars)]


http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?p=1 (http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?p=1) http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2226 http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/k2xylJUWQimQDtEUt9IB7qyNO84/0/di</img> (http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/k2xylJUWQimQDtEUt9IB7qyNO84/0/da)
http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/k2xylJUWQimQDtEUt9IB7qyNO84/1/di</img> (http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/k2xylJUWQimQDtEUt9IB7qyNO84/1/da)
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=H0mrP-F8Qgo</img> (http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=eZmy3NNkkm4:f8tDpknqWdk:H0mrP-F8Qgo) http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=yIl2AUoC8zA</img> (http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=eZmy3NNkkm4:f8tDpknqWdk:yIl2AUoC8zA) http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=eZmy3NNkkm4:f8tDpknqWdk:D7DqB2pKExk</img> (http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=eZmy3NNkkm4:f8tDpknqWdk:D7DqB2pKExk) http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=eZmy3NNkkm4:f8tDpknqWdk:V_sGLiPBpWU</img> (http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=eZmy3NNkkm4:f8tDpknqWdk:V_sGLiPBpWU)
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/eZmy3NNkkm4

More... (http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/eZmy3NNkkm4/)