PDA

View Full Version : 117 Beautifully Blurry Photos [Shootingchallenge]



retroremakes
January 25th, 2010, 19:50
http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_chrisandrews_01.jpg (http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/chrisandrews_01.jpg)Motion blur! It doesn't just ruin photos. It's also something that can be used for artistic effect, when done properly. And for the results of this week's Shooting Challenge (http://gizmodo.com/5452934/shooting-challenge-the-beauty-of-blur), we've got 117 photographers who did just that.
First Runner Up

http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_marcelmaynrd.jpg (http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/marcelmaynrd.jpg)
This is my favorite Korg, and I thought this would be pretty cool to capture "In motion!"
I used a Canon Rebel T1I
f/25
20 Second Exposure
18-55mm Lens (shot at 27mm)
ISO 100
Developed in Lightroom2
And my lighting was a small fluorescent tube light, the size you would put in a closet and such... -Marcel Maynard
Second Runner Up

http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_shantmeguerdichian.jpg (http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/shantmeguerdichian.jpg)
Camera:Canon EOS REBEL T1i
Lens: 18-55m F/3.5
Exposure:3.2
Aperture:f/22.0
Focal Length:28 mm
ISO Speed:100
Exposure Bias:-1/3 EV
-Shant Meguerdichian
Winner

http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_davidmcgibbon.jpg (http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/davidmcgibbon.jpg)
Picture of a carousel at night in London taken without a tripod and
after a few drinks. I wanted to test out the low light performance of
my new Canon S90 point-and-shoot camera and decided to lengthen the
shutter speed and see what I ended up with. This is the first time
I've ever submitted a photo to the Gizmodo Shooting Challenge.
Camera: Canon S90
Shutter Speed: 0.81 sec
Aperture: F/8
Focal Length 6mm
ISO: 80
Exposure Compensation: -0.7 step
-David McGibbon



http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?p=1 (http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?p=1)http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2226http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=H0mrP-F8Qgo</img> (http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=UUr6lneh5ac:pM3z7CRsJik:H0mrP-F8Qgo) http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=yIl2AUoC8zA</img> (http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=UUr6lneh5ac:pM3z7CRsJik:yIl2AUoC8zA) http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=UUr6lneh5ac:pM3z7CRsJik:D7DqB2pKExk</img> (http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=UUr6lneh5ac:pM3z7CRsJik:D7DqB2pKExk) http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=UUr6lneh5ac:pM3z7CRsJik:V_sGLiPBpWU</img> (http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=UUr6lneh5ac:pM3z7CRsJik:V_sGLiPBpWU)
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/UUr6lneh5ac

More... (http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/UUr6lneh5ac/117-beautifully-blurry-photos)