retroremakes
March 3rd, 2010, 13:20
http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_gold-lomo.jpgLomo cameras (back in the day) were popular as they were cheap as chips and almost disposable, made from just flimsy plastic. Now, they're coated in 24-carat gold and in limited edition runs of 130 pieces.
It'll still produce the same dreamy photos full of saturated colors and vignetted corners, but at $600 a piece it'll probably be relegated to a dusty shelf than actually be used. Still, I definitely want one—especially now that I can spoil the aesthetic completely with Lomography's new instant back accessory (http://gizmodo.com/5480066/lomographys-classic-lc+a%252B-now-has-an-instant-back-accessory-for-polaroid+like-photos) for the LC-A+. [Lomography (http://usa.shop.lomography.com/cameras/lc-a-cameras/lomo-lc-a-gold) via Retro To Go (http://www.retrotogo.com/2010/03/lomography-introduces-the-lomo-lca-gold-camera-limited-to-just-130-worldwide.html)]
http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_lomk-gold2.jpg
http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?p=1 (http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?p=1)http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2226http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=H0mrP-F8Qgo</img> (http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=wv_rfYOS5fM:jUsKuAwFnSE:H0mrP-F8Qgo) http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=yIl2AUoC8zA</img> (http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=wv_rfYOS5fM:jUsKuAwFnSE:yIl2AUoC8zA) http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=wv_rfYOS5fM:jUsKuAwFnSE:D7DqB2pKExk</img> (http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=wv_rfYOS5fM:jUsKuAwFnSE:D7DqB2pKExk) http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=wv_rfYOS5fM:jUsKuAwFnSE:V_sGLiPBpWU</img> (http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=wv_rfYOS5fM:jUsKuAwFnSE:V_sGLiPBpWU)
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/wv_rfYOS5fM
More... (http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/wv_rfYOS5fM/lomo-lc+a%252B-camera-goes-high+end-with-24+carat-gold-finish)
It'll still produce the same dreamy photos full of saturated colors and vignetted corners, but at $600 a piece it'll probably be relegated to a dusty shelf than actually be used. Still, I definitely want one—especially now that I can spoil the aesthetic completely with Lomography's new instant back accessory (http://gizmodo.com/5480066/lomographys-classic-lc+a%252B-now-has-an-instant-back-accessory-for-polaroid+like-photos) for the LC-A+. [Lomography (http://usa.shop.lomography.com/cameras/lc-a-cameras/lomo-lc-a-gold) via Retro To Go (http://www.retrotogo.com/2010/03/lomography-introduces-the-lomo-lca-gold-camera-limited-to-just-130-worldwide.html)]
http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_lomk-gold2.jpg
http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?p=1 (http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?p=1)http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2226http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=H0mrP-F8Qgo</img> (http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=wv_rfYOS5fM:jUsKuAwFnSE:H0mrP-F8Qgo) http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=yIl2AUoC8zA</img> (http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=wv_rfYOS5fM:jUsKuAwFnSE:yIl2AUoC8zA) http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=wv_rfYOS5fM:jUsKuAwFnSE:D7DqB2pKExk</img> (http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=wv_rfYOS5fM:jUsKuAwFnSE:D7DqB2pKExk) http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=wv_rfYOS5fM:jUsKuAwFnSE:V_sGLiPBpWU</img> (http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?a=wv_rfYOS5fM:jUsKuAwFnSE:V_sGLiPBpWU)
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/wv_rfYOS5fM
More... (http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/wv_rfYOS5fM/lomo-lc+a%252B-camera-goes-high+end-with-24+carat-gold-finish)