allaboutsymbian
March 16th, 2010, 13:20
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/parallels-benchmark-20100316-600.jpg (http://www.mactech.com/articles/special/1002-VirtualizationHeadToHead/)
With Steam officially hitting Mac in just a few weeks (http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/valve-confirms-steam-for-mac-debuts-in-april/) many Apple gamers have suddenly lost their need to emulate. But, for those who are hoping to get busy in a little Command & Conquer 4 under Snow Leopard this week -- or any of the other myriad of PC-only gaming options -- virtualization is the only way to go -- short of rebooting into Boot Camp, of course. Parallels (http://www.engadget.com/tag/parallels) is the most commonly used solution, but how does VMware (http://www.engadget.com/tag/vmware)'s Fusion 3 stack up for gaming? Not too well, as it turns out. MacTech sat the two down together on matching Mac hardware and ran them through a number of benchmarks, including 3DMark. The results of that test fall heavily in the favor of Parallels, offering better framerates and far more consistent visuals, which you can see for yourself in a video below. Most of the many, many other tests run favor that option as well, but we won't spoil all eight pages worth of results just waiting for you on the other end of that source link.Continue reading Mac virtualization face-off: VMware Fusion 3 vs. Parallels Desktop 5 (video) (http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/mac-virtualization-face-off-vmware-fusion-3-vs-parallels-deskt/)
Mac virtualization face-off: VMware Fusion 3 vs. Parallels Desktop 5 (video) (http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/mac-virtualization-face-off-vmware-fusion-3-vs-parallels-deskt/) originally appeared on Engadget (http://www.engadget.com) on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:11:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds (http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/).
Permalink (http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/mac-virtualization-face-off-vmware-fusion-3-vs-parallels-deskt/) http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gifThe Unofficial Apple Weblog (http://www.tuaw.com/2010/03/15/found-footage-vmware-gets-schooled-by-parallels-in-mactech-benc/) | http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gifMacTech (http://www.mactech.com/articles/special/1002-VirtualizationHeadToHead/) | Email this (http://www.engadget.com/forward/19401058/) | Comments (http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/mac-virtualization-face-off-vmware-fusion-3-vs-parallels-deskt/#comments)
More... (http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/mac-virtualization-face-off-vmware-fusion-3-vs-parallels-deskt/)
With Steam officially hitting Mac in just a few weeks (http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/valve-confirms-steam-for-mac-debuts-in-april/) many Apple gamers have suddenly lost their need to emulate. But, for those who are hoping to get busy in a little Command & Conquer 4 under Snow Leopard this week -- or any of the other myriad of PC-only gaming options -- virtualization is the only way to go -- short of rebooting into Boot Camp, of course. Parallels (http://www.engadget.com/tag/parallels) is the most commonly used solution, but how does VMware (http://www.engadget.com/tag/vmware)'s Fusion 3 stack up for gaming? Not too well, as it turns out. MacTech sat the two down together on matching Mac hardware and ran them through a number of benchmarks, including 3DMark. The results of that test fall heavily in the favor of Parallels, offering better framerates and far more consistent visuals, which you can see for yourself in a video below. Most of the many, many other tests run favor that option as well, but we won't spoil all eight pages worth of results just waiting for you on the other end of that source link.Continue reading Mac virtualization face-off: VMware Fusion 3 vs. Parallels Desktop 5 (video) (http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/mac-virtualization-face-off-vmware-fusion-3-vs-parallels-deskt/)
Mac virtualization face-off: VMware Fusion 3 vs. Parallels Desktop 5 (video) (http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/mac-virtualization-face-off-vmware-fusion-3-vs-parallels-deskt/) originally appeared on Engadget (http://www.engadget.com) on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:11:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds (http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/).
Permalink (http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/mac-virtualization-face-off-vmware-fusion-3-vs-parallels-deskt/) http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gifThe Unofficial Apple Weblog (http://www.tuaw.com/2010/03/15/found-footage-vmware-gets-schooled-by-parallels-in-mactech-benc/) | http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gifMacTech (http://www.mactech.com/articles/special/1002-VirtualizationHeadToHead/) | Email this (http://www.engadget.com/forward/19401058/) | Comments (http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/mac-virtualization-face-off-vmware-fusion-3-vs-parallels-deskt/#comments)
More... (http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/mac-virtualization-face-off-vmware-fusion-3-vs-parallels-deskt/)