Log in

View Full Version : THE TOP 100 GAMES OF THE 21st CENTURY


wraggster
August 1st, 2006, 19:08
Next-Gen.Biz has ranked the top 100 games of the PlayStation 2 / Xbox / GameCube generation based wholly on unit sales. Analysis includes revenues, average review scores, commentary, spin-offs and more.

More Info (http://next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3537&Itemid=2)
ACID
August 1st, 2006, 20:13
i dont agree with half of the games.
Cooe14
August 1st, 2006, 20:55
The last page (page 11) isn't working for me.
Shadowblind
August 1st, 2006, 20:57
the link is broken
JKKDARK
August 1st, 2006, 22:57
No, I don't like.
thesandman
August 2nd, 2006, 06:56
. . . eww
drew4237
August 2nd, 2006, 08:16
some are good but there arnt many that i liked in many of the pages
Sk8.4.Life
August 2nd, 2006, 08:24
Honestly, after going through that entire list, I'm gonna have to say it's a mere "guide" at best. There is no way in hell that is accurate at all. In example, immediatly after getting to #1, I thought to myself, "Where's Halo 2?" I mean honestly. And another thing, they were going by overall sales for the games entire lifetime. You can't compare some game thats been selling for 10 years to something that just came out and call the older one better, simply because it's sold more copies... My god.
Uruz 6
August 2nd, 2006, 09:25
How come shrek and harry potter were there while Suikoden - Wild Arms - Xenogears - Breath of Fire - Front Mission were not? and don't tell me it's because of sales.
BL4Z3D247
August 2nd, 2006, 09:30
OMG Xenogears!!! forgot about that game, now i want a ps1 emu even more, thanx Uruz 6 lol jk...but about the list, i disagreed with most of it as everyone else has stated, some of games shouldn't have been on that list at all
ninja9393
August 3rd, 2006, 08:00
yeah right this list is retarded
dtothabreezy
August 3rd, 2006, 08:29
its a 21 century list after 2000 is when it started counting but there was absolutley no suprise what was on top was there:cool: