PDA

View Full Version : you see that racist psp add?



ßüboni¢ $oñic
September 2nd, 2006, 19:25
I think these people need to develop a new common sense divison at the HQ...


Sony, seriously, this is getting out of hand. Every time we want to rethink what you're doing and try to back you guys up, you go and pull some stunt like this latest ad campaign in Holland, which, as one can see above, depicts a "white PSP" avatar/model violently holding the mouth of a "black PSP" avatar/model -- in commemoration of the launch of the ceramic white PSP, of course. The billboard pictured here is one of supposedly somewhere near 100 evocative images created for the campaign with the same theme, which found viewers of the ads -- and game lovers alike -- crying foul at Sony's latest foible cum PR fiasco (and believe us, we're sure to catch some fire for calling it just that). When it comes down to it we honestly don't think Sony is stupid enough to mean any ill will -- or smart enough to capitalize on a PR firestorm -- with such an ad campaign. But instead of confronting the issue and addressing peoples' concerns, they meagerly defended themselves to GamesIndustry.biz with the following: "The marketing campaign for the launch of the White PSP in the Benelux focuses on the contrast between the Black PSP model and the new Ceramic white PSP model," and "A variety of different treatments have been created as a campaign to either highlight the whiteness of the new model or contrast the black and the white models. Central to this campaign has been the creation of some stunningly photographed imagery..." Oh, make no mistake Sony, the animosity and drama of the imagery, the visceral emotional implication of powerful racial overtones, this is a huge blunder. And once again we find ourselves urging -- nay, demanding -- Tokyo reevaluate what the hell it is they're doing these days. Because mistake or not, this biz doesn't fly, Sony, and you're not helping the perception that you're an incredibly callous megacorp with little real direction.

P.S. -As always, we encourage a discussion. A sensitive, intellectual, worldly discussion. If you can't infer what it is we're asking of our dear readers tempted to intone on this matter, then please skip commenting on this thread, mkay?



http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/06/sony-under-fire-for-racist-advertising/

I've seen the ads and are surprised they are in the homeland of Afrikaners....

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v493/adampeepers/sony_whiteiscoming_web_2.jpg
if they were the same race perhaps no outrage.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v493/adampeepers/sony_whiteiscoming_web_1.jpg
sorta silly.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v493/adampeepers/sony_whiteiscoming_web_3a.jpg could had been hot..

bullhead
September 2nd, 2006, 19:30
I think it looks pretty cool...

PlagueMusic
September 2nd, 2006, 20:46
old news, yes it does look cool but racial dominance in my view but when you use it as a psp metaphor, no it isnt

Btw it could been hot w/ the "white" chick :D

M!ckeY
September 3rd, 2006, 00:14
yeah this news is very old :)

ßüboni¢ $oñic
September 4th, 2006, 22:23
there are no doubt dark Blacks and pale Whites but they should never be used in this manner..

I'd love to see two women of the same race though fight like that. That gets me hot down there.
Steve Irwin 1962-2006, R.I.P.

Video_freak
September 4th, 2006, 22:26
yeah this news is very old :)
Very old news. I liked those commercials (OMG, does that mean I'm racist?! :eek:)

BL4Z3D247
September 4th, 2006, 22:44
only racists see racism, we are all just people in the end :D

ryutoki
September 5th, 2006, 04:57
only racists see racism

That pretty flawed logic. >_>

But yeah, somtimes people are just way oversensetive and try to bash anything and everything that isn't "politically correct." That's one of the things I don't like the U.S. Too many people who try to make everything so politically correct that it's ridiculous. I mean, there are even people who want to censor male pronouns out of school text books because it's supposedly "sexist." Give me a break. -_-

ßüboni¢ $oñic
September 6th, 2006, 12:35
oh pls, dont try to turn this subject into a pandora's box! representing dark skinned Black folk and the pale Whites as anything of those actual "colors" leads to conflict. its not good to represent the darker Black folk and the paler Whites as avatars for anything of those "colors". They have specific conitations not compatiable with humanic harmony.. Of course the Dutch don't get it, being the homelAND Of Afrikaners, I don't expect them too..

bullhead
September 6th, 2006, 13:08
You have a very colourful vocabulary. Im jealous.

Accordion
September 6th, 2006, 14:48
oh pls, dont try to turn this subject into a pandora's box! representing dark skinned Black folk and the pale Whites as anything of those actual "colors" leads to conflict. its not good to represent the darker Black folk and the paler Whites as avatars for anything of those "colors". They have specific conitations not compatiable with humanic harmony.. Of course the Dutch don't get it, being the homelAND Of Afrikaners, I don't expect them too..

this guy is serioulsy altered…

bullhead
September 6th, 2006, 17:00
"altered" ... Well put sir.

ACID
September 6th, 2006, 17:07
super old news

hockey2112
September 6th, 2006, 18:40
So why is it called racism when the white chick is "dominant" towards the black chick (photo # 1), but when the black chick is towering over a submissive white chick (photo # 3), there is no problem at all?

ryutoki
September 7th, 2006, 02:59
oh pls, dont try to turn this subject into a pandora's box! representing dark skinned Black folk and the pale Whites as anything of those actual "colors" leads to conflict. its not good to represent the darker Black folk and the paler Whites as avatars for anything of those "colors". They have specific conitations not compatiable with humanic harmony.. Of course the Dutch don't get it, being the homelAND Of Afrikaners, I don't expect them too..

Hmmm, there seems to be a secret message hidden in here...

I've got it!

BWBWTODANDOAI!

You're a sneaky one, ßüboni¢ $oñic, but I'm on to you.


So why is it called racism when the white chick is "dominant" towards the black chick (photo # 1), but when the black chick is towering over a submissive white chick (photo # 3), there is no problem at all?

Duh. It's because we white people aren't considered good enough to be a race. That's also why people of other races can get special grants and privileges for college, but white people can't.

VampDude
September 7th, 2006, 18:27
lmao @ ryutoki

BWBWTODANDOAI!

BWBWTODANDOAI!

BWBWTODANDOAI!

woooo it's black magic! lmao


Please note:
This message is'nt intended to cause offence racially in any way, I just have an odd sense of humour.
Those who think differently should get a life, as there is no racism here on DCemu!

Wally
September 8th, 2006, 00:07
Correct me if im wrong, but what does this have to do with development??

gymnotropic
September 8th, 2006, 21:28
Correct me if im wrong, but what does this have to do with development??
I was just wondering the same thing...

And:
racism
–noun
1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2. a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.
- Dictionary.com

I don't see how it's racist at all. Showing two different races? Yes. Hateful and discriminating against different races? No.