wraggster
August 15th, 2012, 02:36
Anton Vickerman, who owned SurfTheChannel.com, has been sentenced to 4 years in prison (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19253359) following his conviction last month for 'conspiracy to defraud.' (https://torrentfreak.com/surfthechannel-owner-found-guilty-of-conspiracy-to-defraud-120627/) This is the first successful prosecution of an individual in the UK for running a website merely linking to allegedly infringing content (several earlier cases collapsed or resulted in acquittals). Vickerman was prosecuted for the controversial offense of 'conspiracy to defraud' for 'facilitating copyright infringement,' rather than for copyright infringement itself, and it is worth noting that the relevant copyright offense carries a maximum prison sentence of only two years (https://torrentfreak.com/surfthechannel-owner-sentenced-to-four-years-in-jail-120814/) — half of what was given. FACT, the Hollywood-backed enforcement group who were heavily involved in the prosecution (https://torrentfreak.com/undercover-mpaa-agents-expose-alleged-movie-pirates-120521/) noted that the conviction (http://www.fact-uk.org.uk/four-year-prison-sentence-for-illegal-website-owner/) 'should send a very strong message to those running similar sites that they can be found, arrested and end up in prison,' but it remains to be seen whether this will have any effect on pirate sites, or encourage development of the largely hopeless (https://twitter.com/OpenRightsGroup/status/235387639245713408) legal market for online film.