PDA

View Full Version : Giant NES gives PS3 run for its money!



wraggster
March 26th, 2007, 22:14
via tanooki (http://www.thetanooki.com/2007/03/24/giant-nes-gives-ps3-run-for-its-money/)

http://www.thetanooki.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/giantnes.jpg

Giant controllers are so last week! I don’t know what’s better: the working light, this guy’s sexy supermodel pose, or the fact that this NES has wheels!

When in doubt, always choose the wheels. Always.

keefurxxcore
March 26th, 2007, 22:22
ps3 owns it, nes sucks compared to ps3. but that nes WOW! it could kill the ps3 by stepping on it! ps3 wouldn't have time to use its blu ray powers to kill stufflike in the commercial.

Triv1um
March 26th, 2007, 22:59
The nes is actully the normal size.

The guy ontop is a albanian midget.

JKKDARK
March 26th, 2007, 23:02
ps3 owns it, nes sucks compared to ps3. but that nes WOW! it could kill the ps3 by stepping on it! ps3 wouldn't have time to use its blu ray powers to kill stufflike in the commercial.

NES was a total success

SSaxdude
March 26th, 2007, 23:47
ps3 owns it, nes sucks compared to ps3. but that nes WOW! it could kill the ps3 by stepping on it! ps3 wouldn't have time to use its blu ray powers to kill stufflike in the commercial.

NES has TONS of great games, what does the PS3 have? Remember, better graphics DOESN'T mean better. Here are some other neat NES things: http://crazybob.travisbsd.org/projects/nesmod/nes1.html
http://www.g4tv.com/attackoftheshow/features/51429/Behind_the_DPad.html

penileartery
March 27th, 2007, 00:14
jesus can u read? he said compared to ps3

Balthasar00
March 27th, 2007, 00:51
Sony always had more great games than nintendo. Don't count in nes and snes titles. ;) Sony ps3 haven't half a year old so I wouldn't worry to much about games offered right now. I agree that launch titles were cheap. But that not a big deal, its only a matter of time before Gran Turismo, FF XIII, Tekken, the new ico team projet, Assasin creed, ETC.. comes out.

Soon, valuable stuff will arrives.. It will boost ps3 sales and make the wheel turn faster. Once again, Sony choosed to make things harder for game developpers. The Cell architecture sure don't help them to release games fast. More work, more wait, more fun? ;)


Remember, better graphics DOESN'T mean better.

Can't be more agree. I played FF XII last weekend for the first time, and Its make me miss the old snes era of this serie very much. :(

I wont throw my money in another great looking but boring game like doom 3 was. I prefer by far rpg's to other genre and sony did his job well since the psx. In fact, after the snes, its sony that helped this genre to grow bigger. Pc started it and is still offering great ones nowaday.. The ps3 will certandly follow the same path and offer as much great rpgs as the psx and ps2 offered I really hope. Or, the game devs will go for the wii since its a lighter system to work on, well documented and now have more than 6 mil user. I would like to see more old-school rpgs like dragon warriors or ff III ds on the wii. I would then buy one.

mavsman4457
March 27th, 2007, 03:59
ps3 owns it, nes sucks compared to ps3. but that nes WOW! it could kill the ps3 by stepping on it! ps3 wouldn't have time to use its blu ray powers to kill stufflike in the commercial.

I agree with you post %19283. After seeing this thread I thought, "This thing is just as good as a PS3? Why haven't I heard about it?!" I then did a quick ebay search and found that I could get one for $30 after shipping. And I thought the PS3 wasn't selling for that much on ebay, but this thing must have been flying off of the production line and screwed the scalpers over who were trying to make a quick buck by reselling on ebay. Kudos to whatever company makes this NES and their ability to manufacture with such speed. Microsoft, Sony, and even Nintendo could learn a lesson from this company. Now I was psyched to get this NES for such a bargain of $30 and when I opened the package I was pleasantly surprised that it was much smalled than the PS3. So far so good, but not good enough. When I popped in a game to play on my high-def TV (I couldn't find anything about it playing in 1080P so I assume it just plays in 720P) I was sadly dissappointed. Not only did this thing not have rumble but there was no motion sensing either. Chalk one up for the PS3. After I got through the menu and into the actual game I found that this NES did not even have good graphics. They were embarrassing. My advice to anyone reading this thread: don't believe the hype, PS3 has a leg up on this system.

Balthasar00
March 27th, 2007, 20:02
Now I was psyched to get this NES for such a bargain of $30 and when I opened the package I was pleasantly surprised that it was much smalled than the PS3. So far so good, but not good enough. When I popped in a game to play on my high-def TV (I couldn't find anything about it playing in 1080P so I assume it just plays in 720P) I was sadly dissappointed. Not only did this thing not have rumble but there was no motion sensing either.


I found that this NES did not even have good graphics. They were embarrassing.


My advice to anyone reading this thread: don't believe the hype, PS3 has a leg up on this system.

HaHa ! very funny

and soon, you will have a fun habit to blow air in games cadrige slot in order to get them working. Nes not so high-tech wha ya think ? ;)

Cloudhunter
March 27th, 2007, 20:17
NES has TONS of great games, what does the PS3 have? Remember, better graphics DOESN'T mean better. Here are some other neat NES things: http://crazybob.travisbsd.org/projects/nesmod/nes1.html
http://www.g4tv.com/attackoftheshow/features/51429/Behind_the_DPad.html

How about... NES has been out years longer?

Cloudy