PDA

View Full Version : Smudged? :P



Skribblez
December 28th, 2007, 06:33
http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z260/Skribblez9/Supersmudgedspritesig.jpg

cnc

JKKDARK
December 28th, 2007, 06:49
wow good signature! Who is that?

Tetris999
December 28th, 2007, 11:40
random sprite

good job anyway you have great concepts buddy ;)

BTW, you need to fix its file size or a mod called shryguy is totally going to PWN ure sig (its still 75 kbs right?)

Skribblez
December 28th, 2007, 15:36
It has to be 75kb? And What do you mean? :S

JKKDARK
December 28th, 2007, 16:01
The limit is 75K. But don't worry, the staff will not notice it's more than 75K until 3 months later

Napalm-Death
December 28th, 2007, 16:09
That's Ash Crimson from The King of Fighters. Pretty signature, I'd like it more if I was an Ash fan. :P

Skribblez
December 28th, 2007, 17:12
haha, I got more this is kinda old but its the newest :P

Tetris999
December 28th, 2007, 19:39
http://interviews.dcemu.co.uk/sigwarning_final.png

lol there we go, he got you pretty fast (try saving it as a png it might take up less space)

Skribblez
December 29th, 2007, 01:44
Yeah, they read the threads don't they? Cause someone blurted it out :P

Triv1um
December 29th, 2007, 10:10
Like Tetris said.

PNG it. Its better quality and smaller.

beetroot bertie
December 29th, 2007, 14:15
Personally, I'd say use Jpegs and balance the compression with final size so you get something that compromises both good looks and file size. I've done some examples below to illustrate my point. All are Jpegs with 80% quality and the file sizes are much more friendly to the forums than the PNG files you folks are using. Hope this helps and that you could use them to help speed up forum browsing.

http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/3989/mytemplarsig3jpg20kte4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/3927/supersmudgedspritesigjpxx9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/7163/toslcopyua4jpg24kpb1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

Skribblez
December 29th, 2007, 15:47
Personally, I'd say use Jpegs and balance the compression with final size so you get something that compromises both good looks and file size. I've done some examples below to illustrate my point. All are Jpegs with 80% quality and the file sizes are much more friendly to the forums than the PNG files you folks are using. Hope this helps and that you could use them to help speed up forum browsing.

http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/3989/mytemplarsig3jpg20kte4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/3927/supersmudgedspritesigjpxx9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/7163/toslcopyua4jpg24kpb1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

Can I steal your link to my signature? :eek::rolleyes::p

beetroot bertie
December 29th, 2007, 16:08
Feel free. It's your work after all. :D

I only resaved the images to illustrate my point and the links are just the imageshack ones you get when you upload via the panel at the bottom of the quick reply box I'm currently typing in. I don't know if they stay there indefinitely so you might want to drag and drop your sig to your desktop/compooter first for a backup copy.

Triv1um
December 29th, 2007, 18:27
Nice, you got that very low.

Though i have to say the png of mine looks better.