I loved the way with the Lord of the rings films you had the extended versions with at least 40 minutes of extra footage, why didnt they do the same with goblet of fire and prisoner of azkeban.
for a true harry potter fan the longer the better
Printable View
I loved the way with the Lord of the rings films you had the extended versions with at least 40 minutes of extra footage, why didnt they do the same with goblet of fire and prisoner of azkeban.
for a true harry potter fan the longer the better
they dont know wut extra footege to add i guess, but that would be cool:cool:
theres so much more in the Book it could have easily been a 4 hour film,
they should actually had the Quidditch world cup in there also they left out alot of other things
Maybe they just didn't have that much footage left out...
long films don't always hold peoples attention, I would get bored sitting in a cinema watching films that are 3+ hours (I fall asleep through 2hour movies)