tssk tssk
but greed isnt just one of the greatest characters on fma
but whats there to do
ill tell u go to dcemu....:)
Printable View
tssk tssk
but greed isnt just one of the greatest characters on fma
but whats there to do
ill tell u go to dcemu....:)
Our ads are necessary to keep the network alive. We have 4 high end dedicated servers to pay for.Quote:
Originally Posted by quzar
And viewing ads is not exactly the same thing as asking someone to pay for downloads. Or pay to remove ads. Sour apples and sweet oranges. ;)
Tsk tsk.. charging for homebrew.. what a absolute discrace shame on those other sites.. also another reason why i love DCEMU so much! ;)
BALDERDASH!!!! i dont know who the heck would make people friggin PAY for little home made games on thier psp. i mean, are people really THAT greedy?? and if they says thing like: but i have to pay the bandwith blablabla i would say well u can just put some ads on ur site. :P
it is very much so true!
I don't think anybody said that.. for starters.Quote:
Originally Posted by quzar
I can't speak to how many ads are necessary because I honestly don't know. I have no idea how much money they bring in nor the traffic of the site itself.
But here's the thing. It sounds like Wragg spends alot of time on this site. So, I don't know if he has another job or not beyond being a webmaster.. this might be his source of income.
REGARDLESS however, running a high-bandwidth and high-storage (because this site gets alot of traffic) site DOES cost money, besides the obvious time-committment. Either a server is involved ($$$$) or paid hosting, in either case you have to pay for the server somehow. Also, if the server is owned, there's the issue of paying for a good enough connection to the 'net to support the bandwidth used.
Anyway, running a big site like DCEmu isn't cheap... I know.. being a webmaster.... if I had the same traffic as DCEmu and put as much time into my site as Wragg does with the DCEmu network, I would probably want some ad revenue due to the fact that I might very well likely have to quit either college or my job to handle it.
and about paying for homebrew, how the heck is that any different than a company selling its own software or an artist selling his own music? it just depends how much someone is willing to pay for it. there is NO cardinal rule of homebrew (which is NO DIFFERENT from any other kind of software except that it's done on a system that doesn't officially support it) that states that it has to be free. While I totally support this site and Wrag and Martin to the end, I sometimes disagree when wrag downplays the legitimacy of selling homebrew (that is, if YOU made it).
The difference comes when selling the homebrew is breaking the law. This is when the author of the homebrew uses Open-source code or someone else' non-open-source code (which would be a feat, I'm sure) and then sells the product WITHOUT making it open-source.
Here is, however, what IS legal regarding software based on other open-source software:
You can charge for open-source software, even if its based on someone else's open-source software. But, you MUST (!!!!) release your software under the SAME LICENSE as the original, from which the derivitive is taken from.. that means, anybody who pays to use your software must be able to recieve the source-code as well as have any other privileges that users of open-source software recieve. It is perfectly legal for THEM, after having paid to use your software, modify it and sell THEIR version to someone else, as long as it too retains the same open-source license. Or, they could give it away for free, legally, because it is open-source and since they have the source, they can release it however they want, as long as it stays under the same open-source license.
I could be wrong about this, I'm not OSS scholar, but this is my understanding of it.
The other thing is, to charge for services related to the use of software, while the software itself remains free, is also perfectly legal, as long as that software has the proper license itself (meaning, say, if PSIX is based on open source code, the source for PSIX must be made availible without question due to what I said earlier. If PSIX is NOT based on open source code, then fluff can do whatever he wants with it. Absolutely and completely anything, legally and, frankly, without blame. Regardless, to charge for services such as support, priority updates, beta testing privileges, etc. is COMPLETELY legal and is a COMMON PRACTICE among the software world. Look at Red Hat Linux...)
I've said this before, also, that no homebrew dev deserves to be forced into providing their work in a 'certain way'. If you prefer, they can simply not offer it at all, thankyouverymuch! They're doing a service just by doing what they do, if they want to charge for it, they certainly have the moral right to do so (assuming their code and whatnot is provided in a legal way, doesn't violate copyright law, and so forth). That's like walking up to a guy painting portraits on the street and claiming that he needs to do yours for free, just 'cause it isn't costing him money to do it. It costs his time though! honestly, it bugs me when people think that they deserve something that they really don't, or have these ideals like, "all software should be offered for free to everybody". It's nice when people give you free stuff but you can't blame them when they decline....
anyway, sorry for all the caps, I was just trying to accentuate certain points and I was too lazy to 'bold' things haha ;)
I didn't think the horse would be brought back to be beaten again, but it seems some horse always comes back in time here.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxSMoke
I will agree with MaxSmoke, this sounds a lot like the pot calling the kettle black. We don't even know how much wraggster is making on the advertisements that literally plague this site. Every single one of the products and games he posts about (from slow shipping and expensive companies) contains an affiliate id, making him more affiliate commission money at the expense of you. The first thing you see when you load up psp-news' front page is no news, just huge google advertisements.
You are making money on this site wraggster, this is not just a hobby like you claim it to be. seems that once again.. gun, shoot, foot.
yea... draconumPB has a point
things like m64 and pacmanfan's ps1 emulator.. i would pay as much as 5 dollars for
but still i dont think 90% of homebrew should cost money
and about the ads... ads are no big deal... i didnt ever notice ads on the site until reading this
That is true.Quote:
After all, this website is supported pretty heavily by Lik Sang and HK Success, neither of which are very good companies and you are unabashedly positive about everything they sell.
But... who cares? If a webmaster wants to do that, there's absolutely nothing wrong with it. It's a common internet practice and a legitimate method of both advertising and making ad-revenue.
The best claim you could probably make regarding this issue is to say that it is annoying to visitors of the site. Maybe it diminishes the appeal to a degree. But it's not like, because a website has become less appealing to you, that you've been harmed in any way... and like you said, it's better than alot of the other websites out there which just continue to reach new lows in order to make cash. I wouldn't really consider this a 'low', however, because like I said, it's a legitimate practice and I can't see what else you can say about it.
What wragg seems to be complaining about in the first place is websites that require people to actually shore up the cash for things that, typically, are free. ( I think. ) He isn't saying, "Wow, look how much money those sites are making off of you because of the ads." So, I think what you're saying about pots and kettles is really kind of a non-sequitor.
One last thing to DCEmu's credit.... while I've never been interested in pruchasing from Lik-Sang or HKSuccess, Play-asia, which wragg has also displayed promotions for, is a VERY GOOD company in my experience. I have ordered two PSP games from there, both imports (obviously) and the shipping for both was $3 (to the US from hong kong.) It took a few weeks but that's to be expected, I picked the cheapest shipping option. I was very happy with them.