Printable View
actually on paper the 360 is a little more powerfull than the ps3.(don t beleave sony video there all CGfake remember how they lie about the "powerfull" emotion engine...the cell procs is the same bullshit)...games will look the same on both console.
and next gen game are so expenssive to make than most of the editor will bring games on both machine to make more money...
nintendo are the only one to bring something new and for a smaller price than the other...
dont u ppls remember how sony lied about da ps2, how powerful it looked in papers N when it was wack, sony disappointed pplz
so i'm stickin wit xbox,<<< anyway der's a few nice game comin out on platform
Go PS3! Ya it's expensive and everything but at what cost? right now bluray players are past 1000$ and the Ps3 is guarunteed less than that and has one built into it. I'm definatly gonna get one cus it ROX. DS sucks, Revolution sucks ballz and the 360 is cool but I'm definatly getting a ps3. PSP is also a thing from the future time warped to now.
I'm for the PS3 because I know it will be the best. Also you cant compare the graphics because the ps3's has special technology in it that 360 doesnt. Also you cant compare them by processor speed, the 360 uses a processor, and the ps3 is using the cell chip which is way more advanced tech. And the nintendo having you pay for emulation of old systems is kind of lame. Plus, yes, Nintendo has good family games. Their games are rather simple, but I like to be challenged myself. The ps2 games are reallly simple for the most part to control really. (Of course there are the ones that are next to impossible to control) The features of the ps3 are much more what im looking for myself.
I have never had a disc read error on my PS2. I've had it forever. I think the only disc read error was on a mega scratched up dvd which my dvd player could even play.Quote:
Perhaps i am lenient toward nintendo and microsoft, but i can seem to recall. none of the consoles i have by nintendo or microsoft have broken down.
ooo... ps2... give it a year... GAH! DISC READ ERROR!
grrrr....
Anyway yeah that's the rant for now. PS3, No contest.
when there are more than 25 xbox 360s built then i will probably buy that next.
-XBOX360-
Xbox and PS3 third party games will be pretty much identical in graphics (developers coming out with games on both consoles won't take the time to spruce them up too much from one console to the other. EA has even said that about the next gen Madden titles). The first party games will probably look better on the PS3, but does it really matter? HD televisions are still pretty new and they won't become overly popular until a couple more years.
Plus the xbox360 will most likely have a price drop when the PS3 comes out being a lot easier on the wallet than the PS3. Frankly, i really don't want to update toa new format as far as movies go, i'm just fine with the good old DVD.
-REVLUTION-
microsoft and sony both loose money are every console sold (well known fact).
because nintendo doesn't have all these fancy new features it might actually (gasp) make money on selling their console. Nintendo has extremely fun and innovative games. They have the best first party games (but that doesn't always make up for lack of third party). I'm extremely intrigued by the possibilites of the new controller, hopefully it pulls through. I'd like to see it live out to it's true potential.
i'm rootin' for good old nintendo. they aren't the huge (in comparison) tyrant known as sony and microsoft.
(eventually i'll buy them all, over a very long time. this stuff is gettin to damn exspensive!)
I'm a huge audio / videophile and do have a 1080 Sony Widescreen HDTV. This affects my decision. I think Blu-Ray will become the adopted standard and surpass HD-DVD popularity. I also look for DTS & 5.1 optical surround output and HD/progressive scan widescreen abilities with games.
For this reason, I will end up owning both XBOX 360 & PS3 most likely but IMO I think the PS3 will take 1st place.
ha ha, Yeah, I still haven't been able to find one.Quote:
Originally Posted by shenske37
I'm in the opposite position. The only high-definition screen that I own is a 17" pc monitor. True, Xbox360 has VGA cables, but who wants to play console games in a stiff computer chair? I'll take the Revolution, the cozy couch, and my good ol' 27" standard TV. If I want awesome, top-of-the-line graphics, I'll play pc games.
Aside from those reasons, the Revolution's price will not exceed $200. That is pure, concentrated, raw awesomeness. The entire system is small, yet dignifiedly sleek. Backwards-compatibility means that I can finally put my ugly gamecube into a dark closet, where it belongs, while still playing my favorite gamecube games.
The Revolution's emulation abilities will rock, simply because old, low-rez games from the NES-SNES era look horrible on a pc monitor. They look so much nicer on a television screen, so the revolution will provide an emulation experience much akin to playing the games on their original consoles.
Now, as for the controller. It looks intriguing. Some people might criticize it, but for those people, I pose a question.....Ever dream about losing use of one hand? On most systems, such a loss would greatly harm your gaming ability. The revolution's controller is designed for one hand; so you can pretty much abandon your worries about someday having an accident and spending the rest of your life playing games with your feet.
Enough said. Revolution will be my console of choice. Viva La Revolution!
half u people are reading dumb magz, browzing st00pid web pages, or watching crap tv shows, u beleev all the lies about consoles from any were... if u all take the time to break the hardware in each console down, and look at the specifications u will see in ure own eyes what is true and what is not.
Sony did not lie about the ps2, they boasted an amazing sysem because it was an amzing system. if any of u people out there EVER find a console that pushes graphics in any place neer the ps2's range wile running at 300Mhz then u can call me rong. sony boasted that there console was efficient, not almighty.
As for some of the comments about ps3 - 360 power... the ps3 knocks 360 flat on its ass, completely flat. The PS3 CPU compaired with 360 CPU isnt all that different, both extreamly powerfull, and would put any desktop computer nowa days to shame. but the cpu isnt all thats important. the power of the gpu is whats most important for those sweet looking HD graphics. The gpu in ps3 is popping out more than twice the raw power than the 360, people seem to think this is sonys attempt to lie about the power in there console... if you have at least 1 part of ure brains (witch i asume u dudes have :P) u would see that there are TWO HD outputs on the ps3, this would mean it requires the extra push so that it can render graphics equaly on each display, its not an attempt to out class the 360 (but i am going to do that now)
the 360 was a rushed machine, pushed off the paper and into factories asap! then off the production lines b4 u knew it! in my eyes, microsoft are not really bothered about winning any "console war" they are only interested in the profits they can take b4 the other next gens are reliesed. that explains why there was no high definition drive included, no WiFi built in, and the main power BRICK! sits outside the console so that the console wont over heat (but it still over heats any way) alot of 360 consoles were returened because of the heating problem causing falts and crashes. there was also a problem with the RAM witch another company developes... altho i gues i cant blame big daddy billy for that :P As for the people that are buying the 360 for its online service... THATS INSANE! the online service for a console will never compair to that of a pc, if ure doing it for the online thing, get a decent graphics card and high speed internet
Rumors about ps3 reliesing 2 versions... no no no. there will be 1 version, this has been confirmed by sony. all will play there blu-ray games, movies, music etc. no confirmation on the hard drive yet, but my guess is that it will be seporate other wise sony would have boasted it off or something :S
the controler, stop complaining!! wat the hell do u people watch wen ure playing games?? ure hands!?! the controler was tested, and said to be cumfy in the palm of your hands, so other than the dodgy looks it should be ok, plus sony claimed it was still a concept design (altho i kinda liked it)
Revolution... i got say, sweet! love the fact that they are staying basic to gamming, all the other console are more like PCs now. but im not a rich guy, so ill stick to emulating the games i have :P
oh! and who was that crayzee man who sed "bring on the cell powered psp" ? i love ure style man!! EXACTLY MY THINKING! :D
one last thing.... i must apologize for my out break, but wen i see some people typing in some crayzee stuff about consoles that aint even true it just bubbles up inside me (not insane) and also not a fan boy :P from first view u would think i was a ps3 person.... I AM :D :D its PS3 or Revolution for me, both those consoles have a truely unique function... PS3 = technologicly insane powerfull piece of kit thats gona replace my home pc if i buy one :D Revolution = Totaly backward compatible! a games console built for gamming! XBOX 360 = Something withabsolutly nothing cool about it :S everything in xbox, u can get somewere else lol :)
good day all :P
P.S ALL SIMILARITIES TO REAL LIFE PEOPLE, COMPANIES AND PLACES ARE PURELY CO-INSODENCE. ALL THE CONTENTS MUST BE CONSIDERED FICTION!
just a little legal protection :) haha!
the next system ill buy is a ds lite the dark blue one. id like to buy the new psp thats rumored with built in memory and camera. i already have the 360 and the ps3 ill wait and see what they do if its over 500 ill wait sony doesnt make the games i play a lot so no big deal and as far as the Revolution goes ill wait and see no hd and some lame ass controller who knows what it will be like