Surely $ony wouldnt waste money on an advert so likely to get banned, even more so after their recent black/white PSP ad fiasco. Thats why I reckon it's fake.
Printable View
Surely $ony wouldnt waste money on an advert so likely to get banned, even more so after their recent black/white PSP ad fiasco. Thats why I reckon it's fake.
I couldn't agree moreQuote:
Originally Posted by 1timeuser
Quote:
Originally Posted by fucht017
please!! get a grip!
it's a bloody advert... and throwing "the good book" at it and declaring it evil wont get rid of it.
i think it's kinda funny. and i love aphex twin.. heh... fine, dont like it (i can see why many wouldnt) but to call it "the works of satan"... laughable.
That was cool, lol, it is not promoting violence in children, it is showing what they could do besides fighting, in turn the PSP is sort of like a mediator between them lol
Dosn't anyone else think it must be faker than a six pound note?
Hah instant classic. Nothing like seeing two kids beat the shit outta one another. Good thing Sony didn't drop in the whole PSP Black and PSP White thing in there ;)
intresting .. ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by compoman386
i had a six pound note once...
erm... anyway, was a highly amusing advert, i liked it, makes me want to go out and buy another psp!
Actually, if you think about it, this ad may be saying that video games lessen violence. If you watch it again, clearly the violence is brought on by more traditional ways of play (sports, for instance; which derived from the Greek and Roman sports, some of which were EXTREMELY violent. Hockey retains much of that today, with its violent fights).Quote:
Originally Posted by 1timeuser
It seems that, if Sony made this ad, that they are trying to inform the public that video games are a safer, non-violent alternative to other pass times. Back in the day, I had seen plenty of scuffles over sports and more active/aggressive games, but more passive games like cards and chess never led to such (at least in my observations).
lmao silly sony. violence is not the answer