Sir, you truly are an idiot. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by S!ms
Sir, you truly are an idiot. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by S!ms
Thanks, but if you join a community you're new to, and some people you don't know say like "that guy, you can trust him!!", will you give him your project you actually only want to keep for yourself or friends?
Quote:
Originally Posted by S!ms
another comment which makes you sound a fool. why should anyone else trust your "friends" say anyway? yes, i understand having your major beta testing done by someboady close (i do a lot of beta-testing myself)... but here we are talking about gaining the respect and trust of a community here, i just thought you should realise you're not going about doing that very well by refusing all proof of work to a third party.
I will let my friends test first, and AFTER that OTHER people. maybe waggster? I don't know. But he isn't better, or more trustworthy than anybody else...
I will release a psp emulator myself before we see anything from you :)Quote:
Originally Posted by S!ms
Quote:
Originally Posted by S!ms
if you only want you and your friends to have it... why release screenshots on a public forum?
its pretty obvious by now that it is situations such as this that cause devs to either keep their projects to themselves until release, or are seen actively enroll a respected member of the community.
it's not exactly rocket science. or assembly coding :p
Read please, i will *maybe* release this for public, as i already said. I only said my friends should beta test first, BEFORE it goes public!
To all of those who said it was stupid for him to not want to send wraggster a beta: would you, if asked, loan wraggster a large sum of money without any kind of contract with his word that he'd pay you back?
If this is real, and he intended on it being a commercial product, why would he send wraggster a copy just to prove it's existance to a bunch of whiney people on an internet forum?
S!ms you should release a beta to wraggster he's pretty trust worthy. just look at AC the coder thats trying to hide his idenity and uses wraggster to put out his work. wraggster even test the beta take screens and post them. he doenst take credit for the work he's just assuring us that its real. he even takes the liberty of not saying who AC really is. if this is legit you should really send at least one beta out to wragg just to shut all of us up.........praise you if this is real
hi,
i have a quick question regarding your screenshots.
on the 2ns ss (plain xmb) it says "daxter.iso" in the title so i would assume that the iso is already mounted. you can see the update icon right below the umd icon (the way it should be)
on the 1st screenshot(daxter) the update icon is missing? why is that?
Get this guy to add PMF support so we can create icon1.pmf's easier
I have another questionQuote:
Originally Posted by DoofDilla
why is it using no more ram when you have the daxter bg and icon loaded? by my reckoning it should be at least 3mb more.
So you're measure of how much you should trust someone is based on the fact that other people trust them? Not a very good system if you ask me.Quote:
Originally Posted by gunntims0103
you know full well that is nothing like the situation here. he wouldnt even have to provide a full beta. he could modify his code, limit the functionality severly (have only one firmware / program work, and for a limitied time or something) and still prove that his work is real.Quote:
Originally Posted by quzar
commercial product??! hahah... get real. that would require Sony endorsement and this is the last thing they would want given all the fuss they've kicked up before regarding emualtion of their machines.Quote:
If this is real, and he intended on it being a commercial product, why would he send wraggster a copy just to prove it's existance to a bunch of whiney people on an internet forum?
read please "i dont intend on releasing this fictional emualtor"Quote:
Originally Posted by S!ms
i'm sorry, but i was quite willing to not have an opinion on the matter, i was merely questioning your attitude towards the members of this public forum, but your responses so far have lead me to have serious doubts regarding crediblity. if you wont give respect to others who you dont know anything about, why should anyone give it to you?
because i just inserted the daxter image, and it took a while to load (it's still slow) so the title bar did updated, but the xmb didn't yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by DoofDilla
So i bet you're asking now why there was already an update icon? Simple: there must be a emulated disc0 or otherwise it crashes.
Try it, go to your psp and instert an umd. the icon/update will appear before the 'game bg' will appear :)
all im saying is that wraggster seems like a thrust worthey guy i mean he is running a whole site if he wasnt trust worthey he would post all our info on sum perv site and we'll be getting pop up's of profanity all day:D ............. and from example as seem on how he handles AC and his work...........he seems pritty thrust worthey............heck if i coded this i would send a beta to wragg just to let everyone know that its true:)Quote:
Originally Posted by quzar
instead of having a news breaking post and have everyone flame you saying that its not real:eek:
this is all im saying
How would that require permission from sony? If it doesn't use anything that they *own* they can't do anything about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hungry Horace
Trust is an extremely subjective thing, adn that is all I want you to realize. Wether or not this is fake doesn't mean that any coder should have to trust wraggster with their program if they don't want to, and their reluctance to do so shouldn't imply that what they are doing doesn't exist.Quote:
Originally Posted by gunntims0103
yea i understand. that the coder reseaves teh right to make his work public or not and just because he/she doesnt want to send a beta to prove its real doenst nessesarily mean its fake
-yes and trust is a extreamly subjective thing i know just because a person seems trust worthey doesnt nessesarily mean that person is
i see the piont quzar
edit--
but quzar dont you think that what s!ms did is wrong and irrisponsible to post pics of his works as "tessers" and then say he's not going public with it you know as well as i do that you would get flamed for this. better to just keep it under rapps all together
thanks for your fast answer.Quote:
Originally Posted by S!ms
as you said, the update icon will appear before the game gb, but thats what i am wondering about because there isnt any update icon in the first screenshot. (or is the update folder stripped from your daxter iso?)
yep, it's ripped :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by quzar
how about the copyright to the phrase "PSP", even the "intellectual concept" behind it.... it's not even possible to argue it as a grey-area.
it would be a piece of piss for Sony to shut down such an emualtor in a court-of-law, even without providing firmware files and you know it. thinking otherwise i would suggest you were deliberatly being naieve.
No, it wouldn't. There is absolutely nothing wrong with commercial emulation w/o permission from the creator of the hardware. Hell, the only way that nintendo was able to shut down the gba emulator for the tapwave (that was going to be sold with it) was that they had patented something to do with gb emulation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hungry Horace
Now, that being said, I'm sure sony COULD somehow shut it down, but it wouldn't be due to it being illegal, it would probably end up as a civil suit of some sort with BS terms not intended for sony to win but simply cost the author a lot of money in legal defense.
I'll beta test !!!!
I think that there are 3 differents point of view regarding a psp-emulator:Quote:
Originally Posted by S!ms
-devs:"Wonderful, with this thing, I'll be able to create better homebrew than ever, because i will take no risk for developing homebrews that the whole community will enjoy safely! besides it makes me gain a lot of time (time that I'll then be able to share with my beloved girlfriend)"
-member of the community (light side):
"whoa! with this thing, I'll be able to test every piece of homebrew before puting it in my real psp, thus I will never take the risk to brick my beloved psp; I will not be scared any more by Warning: New PSP Virus on the Loose! Be Aware!!! kind of news.
And I'm happy to know that the devs can spend more time with their girlfriend! What a wonderful world!!"
-member of the community or not (dark side):
"Hehehe...what another nice way play pirated games!! the emulator isn't released yet but the first thing we know (thanks to the screenshots) is the fact that it runs ISO perfectly (no apparent graphical glitch but slow).Over five screenshots that has been made to describe the capacity of the emulator, 3 of them represent an official game...It seems to have been made for piracy!"
But there is one thing that everyone think about:
It's too good to be real...and it's easy to make fake... And last but not least:If there is no release there is no way to prove either it is real or not!
Now I think that everyone has a little of the 3 points of view but according to what we have of the emulator for the moment, which point of view will win...
I don't support piracy myself, and I had no meaning to make this for pirates. They have to know what to do with it, and i can't block it to refuse 'pirated' iso's, because there's no difference :)
Its alwaysthe same, when someone releases pics of something major, the "too good to be true" phrase gets used alot.
I've learned not to dispute over stuff likes this, it gets us nowhere, lets just wait and see.
You can make the devs point of view or the light side win, it's up to you!
Think about the moment of bliss the devs will share with their girlfriend...they don't have that much time...don't you think it worth it ?
He forgot the dark side of the light side: If this comes out, WE'LL spend less time with our girlfriends :PQuote:
Originally Posted by toto
No offense, S!ms, but this is clearly a fake.
but the light side of the dark side of the light side:Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloudhunter
we will lend our psp to our girlfriend so that we can play against her from the computer ;)
apologies if it was already asked, but i don't want to read the 100+ postings in this thread.
my question:
which hardware specs should our pc have to run an emu like that?
An emulator of that kinda spec really should need a 2ghz+ to run full speed in c and asm in directx.Quote:
Originally Posted by BOzard
this "emu" is meant to be written in java, so I would expect double.
Not to say that it is fake but ..i could make a better fake ....
lol..
seriously ..some one send me loads of psp screenshots and ill make a better fake ..
i'll make videos and everything ..lol
you overestimate the psp's power if you think a proper emulatore in c, asm and with hle hardware rendering (implied by directx) would take a 2+ghz processor. (either that or your measure is an old 2.0ghz p4 200mhzfsb)Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeDX
I'm not going on the newer cores with loads of l2 cache, i am basing it on the old amd 2400xpQuote:
Originally Posted by quzar
first you should make yourself contactable... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by nebulator
err thought i was ...hmm ...fixed ?
http://www.free-screen-capture.com/f.../download.html
Capture a video of the emulator running, then that'll shut everyone up. Using the highest quality and FPS settings in the options, and then zipping it with 7z can zip a 95mb video to a measly 700kb.
Ok...just cos i can ..and for some reason want to,
i will make a fake !
does the emulator support gdb debugging or anything like that? So that those of us that don't have hardware always with us or don't always need hardware to test with while coding homebrew software?
If you need a tester of that type of thing let me know. I don't care for commerical game emulation, just homebrew coding tools.
thanks,
Troy(GPF)
http://gpf.dcemu.co.uk