Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: New survey reveals exciting TV possibilities

                  
   
  1. #1
    Won Hung Lo wraggster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Nottingham, England
    Age
    53
    Posts
    141,507
    Blog Entries
    3209
    Rep Power
    50

    psp New survey reveals exciting TV possibilities

    Via PSPfanboy

    Sony has been sending out some really interesting surveys lately. First, they asked which features could be removed from the PSP (hopefully, users said none). Now, they're asking users if they're interested in mobile television for the PSP. They give users two options: streaming using LocationFree player, or by subscribing to a mobile TV service for $10 a month. Personally, the latter seems much more enticing.

    Considering how Japan has an official PSP media download service called PTV, it makes sense for Sony to expand that to other markets as well. What do you think: should Sony offer portable TV for you? And would you subscribe at that price?

  2. #2
    DCEmu Regular shrimpidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Canada :)
    Posts
    258
    Rep Power
    73

    Default

    Y can't Sony just allow both? It would be cool if they put location free capabilities on the PS3 but that's far too late.

  3. #3
    DCEmu Old Pro mavsman4457's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    East Coast, USA
    Posts
    1,278
    Rep Power
    75

    Default

    I would not subscribe to that. I just hate monthly fees. I would prefer LocationFree over that and I'm pretty sure that PS3 will take care of all of my needs anyways so hopefully I won't have to worry about this.

    Quote Originally Posted by shrimpidy View Post
    Y can't Sony just allow both? It would be cool if they put location free capabilities on the PS3 but that's far too late.
    It's not too late at all. PS3, like the PSP, has different firmwares, which I anticipate will be good since PS3 is completely open to developers, thus they can implement LocationFree into a later firmware.

  4. #4
    PSP User Emeriastone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    MO, USA
    Posts
    612
    Rep Power
    73

    Default

    If it's "Always available cellular technology" then hell yeah I'd completely do that for 10 a month as long as the picture and sound quality are superb.

    But not if it meant I was required to update .

  5. #5
    DCEmu Rookie irishwhip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    112
    Rep Power
    72

    Default

    i'd like an old school tv tuner, like the old game gear one. but i'm weird like that

  6. #6
    King of killed the_eternal_dark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,534
    Rep Power
    80

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by irishwhip View Post
    i'd like an old school tv tuner, like the old game gear one. but i'm weird like that
    I am too, but hey it worked, didn't it? It wasn't that expensive if I can remember as well.

  7. #7
    DCEmu Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,152
    Rep Power
    79

    Default

    Nobody needs more monthly subscription bills.

  8. #8

    Default

    I'd certainly be tempted by the $10 monthly subscription, depending on what channels were offered (I wouldn't need much - a 24 hour news network, and then some junk), and most importantly, whether or not the firmware being used was already cracked.

  9. #9
    DCEmu Regular benn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    349
    Rep Power
    74

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wraggster View Post
    Via PSPfanboy
    They give users two options: streaming using LocationFree player, or by subscribing to a mobile TV service for $10 a month. Personally, the latter seems much more enticing.
    surely you mean the former? why pay $10 a month?

  10. #10
    DCEmu Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Norway
    Age
    33
    Posts
    902
    Rep Power
    76

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by benn View Post
    surely you mean the former? why pay $10 a month?
    The former uses a WiFi connection to stream TV from your own home, which isn't always available and won't work "on the run". The latter uses a network, like WAP and GPRS on the phone, to stream from there, but would cost $10/month.

    So I would prefer the latter one, but only if it would offer me good channels (which I'm sure it would).

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •