
Originally Posted by
bah
John Vattic: Global warming was predicted to severely interfere with the north atlantic current, and as a result areas that are now warm would freeze over. It was never a real contradiction.
The great thing about science is that good science has to be reproducable and others will attempt to disprove the theory. Others in the field have now created better models of these currents and now as a result the fear this could happen is far far less.
Science (in the media) is a tool of whoever has the money to pay for the research and promote only the findings they like. Bad conclusions aren't scientific, they're interpretations of the results shoehorned into the results the group paying for the tests want.
Religion is a tool of established powerful groups (and some crazy televangelists in the USA) mostly. It keeps it's strongest followers ignorant. They suck up all sorts of crazy interpretations of bible passages.
At least bad science often inspires good science to disprove it.
Anyway, to get back on topic: Autism is diagnosed by the subject presenting with a large number of a list of symptoms. Almost all people have one or a few of these symptoms. It means little to nothing.
My mother is a teacher of kids with cerebral palsy, although there are an ever increasing number of kids with autism at her school. I've heard a lot about it from her and can say with certainty that anyone comparing average gamers to people with autism based on one or 2 observations is doing so for a reason other than informing people.
I guess it got them some headlines.
maxipower90: Scientists do not put more toxins into the air than anyone else. Science is a term for man's exploration of his environment and his learning about it though creating and testing hypotheses. If the corporations, governments and the average people they are supposed to serve all valued clean pure air over the cheapest plastic items (etc) then more scientists would be paid to work on reducing it instead of making new junk to sell that pollutes because its cheaper than being clean. When your entire market cares more about cost than cleanliness then what's a corporate head to do? They are obliged to maximise profits any way possible.
Current consumeristic society is a much better scapegoat than science.
Hell, blame marketing. Even if your wrong they still deserve your animosity.
I love how everyone bags china for its terrible pollution, do you think chinese people are buying the bulk of the things they produce? No, its exports.
We have all the dirt cheap plastic (etc) products because our companies produce all the junk we want over there and do it as cheaply as possible.
It's largely our pollution, we just offshored it.
Bookmarks