Lemmings and World Tour Soccer 2 official PAL servers going offline

[Buddy4point0]

Sad, yet there is no point in Sony spending money to keep servers online to keep less than 50 people who still play the games online happy.

[Joe88]

indeed

I would never play these games online anyway
only MGS3 which konami took offline over a year ago

[Sterist]

Maybe they should think about charging for online play like microsoft. $60 a year is peanuts, if you can't afford that, time for a new job.

woah champ. how about baby steps from being well known as ``free´´

some people have trouble getting new / well paying jobs careers etc, believe it or not, the economy is shrinking.

[Murdock]

Sad, yet there is no point in Sony spending money to keep servers online to keep less than 50 people who still play the games online happy.

This is entire bull$#@!!

The people have payed for the games and they've also payed for ALL the goddamn features these games offer ... even if only 2 ppl. would use these features, they still had the right to use them ...

It only shows the bad support and the lousy attitude of Sony towards their customers ... another time ...

Sony doesn't care a $#@! about the ppl. who pay for their overpriced products!

Taking down servers which probably cost Sony less than 100 bucks a year is rediculous ... I guess these things don't even appear on their annual bills ... maybe in the miscellaneous section ... if at all!

1. They don't have to keep coding additional fixes or whatever -> no additional costs

2. These servers don't use much bandwidth, nor much space and computer power -> minor financial factor, I guess not to mention, compared to others

3. the only thing they got to do, I guess, is telling an intern once in a while to restart the ****ing thing ... -> doubt this costs a lot of money


Conclusion: $ony once again squeezes the last cents out of their customers by advertizing online services, offering them for a limited amount of time and then taking them down ... rediculous ... I bet u'll get the payback in the next five to ten years ... when no1 is as dumb s to buy ur ****in crappy stuff for a rediculously high prize!

Shame on u fatass, greedy Japanese business jerks at $ony!

[Psyberjock]

Ummm, Blizzard can afford to keep their servers up cause they specialize in online play, and it's no secret that the PC has more online players than the PS2 or PS3.

Sony brings theirs down to cut down on pointless spending on online games that don't even see more than 30 players per game, if that much. I played Syphon Filter Omega Strain all the time so it's sad for me to see it go down, but that's life, nothing lasts forever.

I just won't forgive Konami for taking down the Metal Gear Solid: Subsistence servers. That game actually had over 500 players around when it got shut down (April 2nd 2007).

Diablo 2 is a FREE online game. If you think Blizzard can afford to support a FREE game for longer than Sony can, then you seriously underestimate the size of Sony's bank account. Until World of Warcraft (and possibly even still) Blizzard was peanuts compared to Sony.

Sony can definitely afford to keep their servers online, they just don't want to.

When you buy a game for $60 and it is only playable online, you had damn well better be able to play for as long and as often as you want.

BTW, somethings seemingly do last forever. Diablo 1 and 2 sure are. Even if Blizzard were to stop supporting them on Battle.net, there's still Open Bnet that you can download, or you can play IP2IP. There's lots of ways to play online even if Blizzard decides to stop running their servers. Did Sony do that?