Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Logical Question concerning Downgrader...

                  
   
  1. #1
    DCEmu Newbie ArKo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    9
    Rep Power
    0

    Question Logical Question concerning Downgrader...

    A psp version higher than 1.51 won't play unsigned code as easilsy, right?
    Because of that develop ideas for downgrading the version, so that it will start homebrew codes, ok -

    BUT isn't a "Downgrader" also something like a Homebrew code?!
    Does this mean we will do start homebrew, downgrading our system to play homebrew?!
    sounds paradox for me...

    If someone manages the downgrader to start - why shouldn't other code start by the same way?

    Do you know what i mean?!

    ArKo

  2. #2
    DCEmu Newbie Gnoccir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    35
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Thats an awesome point. I don't know too much about coding and stuff so I can't answer that, but I'd love to hear from someone who knows more than us.

  3. #3
    DCEmu Pro PSP_Newbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    579
    Rep Power
    75

    Default

    im pretty sure a downgrader would be pretty hard to do, and if they fully exploit what was recently disocovred on psp 2.0 with the photo exploit thing, it wont matter anyways,
    but anyways, i think the concept is that: 1.51+ cant run homebrew games, but they can run manual updates to upgrade to a higher version. if you edit the update, it gets courrupted. if someone manages to edit it somehow to "update" to 1.5 as opposed to a higher version w/out corrupting it, then we have a downgrader. so while it would(or could anyways) be homebrew, its still technically only an edited Sony update which was already signed.
    anyways, thats just my thoughts on it, i hope the 2.0 exploit works out =P

    P.S-i dont know much about coding, so this is just my assumption on what the downgrader would be if someone made one

  4. #4
    DCEmu Newbie
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    96
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    What about running a 1.51 to 2.0 update? That would count as running code on 1.51. So, if you modified a 1.51 updater to change to another version of firmware, you'd have the basics down.

  5. #5
    DCEmu Legend Cap'n 1time's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Right behind you...
    Age
    37
    Posts
    4,547
    Rep Power
    121

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Heran_Bago
    What about running a 1.51 to 2.0 update? That would count as running code on 1.51. So, if you modified a 1.51 updater to change to another version of firmware, you'd have the basics down.
    well that was the original idea. Apparently there is alot more too it though. probably a checksum that they cant modify somewhere in there.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •