Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 34

Thread: How many FLOPS are in game consoles?

                  
   
  1. #21
    DCEmu Rookie trugamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    York, UK
    Posts
    174
    Rep Power
    67

    Default

    Surely this tells us what we already knew, PS3 is the most powerful, followed by the Xbox 360 and then the Wii.

  2. #22
    DCEmu Newbie
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    8
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    1800 GF for the GPU of the ps3 is bull$#@!.
    A 8800ultra has 500. 1800 would mean a performance liek the polaris.

  3. #23
    DCEmu Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    422
    Rep Power
    71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alanparker05 View Post
    I think you're all forgetting about the wii it is much less floppy than the rest but it regularly beats the others on gameplay and sales figures so all these flop numbers mean nothing if they just make pretty games that people will forget about in 6 months
    To be honest, I hate most of the games on wii. They are all very linear and very, very frustrating to me. I think it all comes down to personal choice. Some people really like Wii games(I have friends who do) and some people love ps3 games. I personally love 360 games, stop making this a war and just enjoy whats there.

  4. #24
    DCEmu Reviewer Shadowblind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    PR:SB End
    Posts
    3,796
    Rep Power
    115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by watupgroupie View Post
    To be honest, I hate most of the games on wii. They are all very linear and very, very frustrating to me. I think it all comes down to personal choice. Some people really like Wii games(I have friends who do) and some people love ps3 games. I personally love 360 games, stop making this a war and just enjoy whats there.
    Your not alone, but lets try to avoid this conversation.

    FLOPS (still don't get it) is relative. It hasn't proven one system to be able to play better then another, so whats the point?

    Quote Originally Posted by quzar View Post
    Except for about 50% of the time. Even then, absolutely never in picture quality.

    My Nvidia has the compatibility of a dead squirrel. its more graphically advanced per cost, but its performance is far worse.

  5. #25
    DCEmu Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    89
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Read the responses to the original article. The PS3 numbers are Sony's bullsh*t marketing spin. It is the machine's "potential", but as one respondent pointed out, the PS3 is not capable of reaching even 10% of that number.

    So, you cannot compare the XBox 360 numbers to the PS3 numbers. It's meaningless territory where only fanbois tread. If the PS3 has an advantage on the XBox 360, it's only slight.

  6. #26
    DCEmu Rookie
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    142
    Rep Power
    69

    Default

    I remember when all this were just megaflops.

  7. #27
    DCEmu Rookie
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    142
    Rep Power
    69

    Default

    Oh, and I personally can't wait for us to reach YottaFLOPS. It just sounds so amusing. I want to go into PC World in 2036 and ask, "How many YottaFLOPS can this laptop do then?"

  8. #28
    DCEmu Newbie
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    66
    Rep Power
    0

    Default one question

    .......... What about PSP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA........

  9. #29

    Default

    Flops are just how many instructions the system can handle per second. PS3, if the numbers are correct, is waaay over-kill for games. That is how PS3 does all the water effects. cool? yes. necessary for fun game? no. In the end, what developers do with a system decides which one is more enjoyable.

  10. #30
    DCEmu Reviewer Shadowblind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    PR:SB End
    Posts
    3,796
    Rep Power
    115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by waternova View Post
    Flops are just how many instructions the system can handle per second. PS3, if the numbers are correct, is waaay over-kill for games. That is how PS3 does all the water effects. cool? yes. necessary for fun game? no. In the end, what developers do with a system decides which one is more enjoyable.
    I think the water has more to with the engine then anything else...

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •