Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: MS: 'We want to be first again with Xbox 3'

                  
   
  1. #1
    Nightmaren Shrygue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Kojima Shinden
    Posts
    12,935
    Rep Power
    127

    xbox 360 MS: 'We want to be first again with Xbox 3'

    via Computer and Video Games


    At a "strategy level" Microsoft wants to be first to the market again with its next-generation Xbox, Entertainment & Device Devision boss Robbie Bach has said.

    Speaking during an interview with Venture Beat, Bach said that if you asked him whether being first to market with Xbox 360 was the right decision, he'd say "definitely yes," and the platform holder has a desire to do it again with the next console.

    "The last cycle for the original Xbox was a little shorter than typical (at four years). We started way late," he said. "If you take the question of whether it was the right thing to try to be first [with Xbox 360], the answer to that is definitely yes. It has given us a leg up in a number of places that are super important.

    "It has given us a leg up with game developers. It has given us a leg up from an economics perspective. It helped us expand Xbox Live quickly. At a strategy level, if you asked if we wanted to be first again, I would say yes."

    But the E&DD boss said it was "too early to tell" when quizzed on his expectation for the next console's release plans. "Our view is we will be selling Xbox 360 for a long time," he said.

    "People ask me how many people I have working on the next generation. On the one hand, it's everybody. On the other, it's nobody. People are continuously working on new technology.

    "We start thinking about the next generation before we shipped the Xbox 360," Bach continued. "It doesn't start with a date. It starts way upstream with silicon development.

    "From that comes a series of data points. You start making early technology choices. It's an evolving thing. Stuff doesn't become concrete until you get inside a window of when you have to ship, more than 18 months or so out."

    If we see anything before 2010, we'll be very surprised.

  2. #2
    DCEmu Pro ____anders____'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Alterac Valley
    Age
    33
    Posts
    817
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    hehe, you mean i should wait for the Xbox 3, not buying X360 now??

  3. #3

    Default

    Maybe in 2009 we will see an announcement or something. It will be 4 years of life for the 360, like the Xbox 1.


  4. #4
    DCEmu Regular Airdevil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    274
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ____anders____ View Post
    hehe, you mean i should wait for the Xbox 3, not buying X360 now??
    Pretty much.

    In terms of cost efficientcy, I would buy a PS3. Mainly because Sony say it has a 10 year lifespan, so you wont have to keep dishing out for a new console every 4 years.

  5. #5
    DCEmu Pro osgeld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    822
    Rep Power
    66

    Default

    being first doesnt mean crap, sega was first 3 times (sg1000, gen, dreamcast, maybe saturn i dunno)

    what matters is you dont bring out a big expensive machine with nothing to play on it

    Xbox did it last gen but got out of their tailspin
    PS3 did it this gen and im still waiting

    but look at nintendo

    after the sg1000 prompting the master system
    after the megadrive
    after the playstation
    after the playstation2
    and after the 360

    and still sell like mad, why cause they have great games, and people will wait a year or 2 just to get them (eventho personally ive been joking about zelda #87, and mario #124 for over 10 years)
    Last edited by osgeld; June 17th, 2008 at 00:09.

  6. #6
    DCEmu Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    340
    Rep Power
    66

    Default

    i just hope that the next xbox design is not as flawed as the xbox 360 as so far my 360 broke twice first with rrod and then after getting that repaired i got dvd magnet problem that i fixed my self by opening the whole machine up which i have to say is dam easy and reapply the superglue to where the crappy magnet was in the first place.

  7. #7

    Default

    If they keep coming out quickly, I won't have reason to buy any Xbox's. The only reason I didn't buy an Xbox is the price was too high. When it became reasonably priced the 360 was out. Now that the 360 is getting close to reasonably priced, there is talk of another one?

    The Dreamcast came out first too. It was a great system but it didn't do so hot.

  8. #8
    DCEmu Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,152
    Rep Power
    75

    Default

    Too much talk this early of another XBOX tells me that Microsoft is not all that satisfied with the way things are going. I will admit that XBOX Live is better than the PSN. But ever since I got my PS3 I have all but abandoned the 360. Its only used for Halo 3 currently.

    The PS3 hardware is far superior and the fact that it doubles as a Blu-Ray player, supports HDMI, etc. makes it much more desirable to me.

    Oh, by the way... Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots is the most amazing game thus far for the PS3. I'm blown away after playing that masterpiece and can't put it down.

  9. #9
    DCEmu Rookie
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    120
    Rep Power
    66

    Default Lets have a serious look

    Quote Originally Posted by Airdevil View Post
    Pretty much.

    In terms of cost efficientcy, I would buy a PS3. Mainly because Sony say it has a 10 year lifespan, so you wont have to keep dishing out for a new console every 4 years.
    Well the 10 years lifespan depends on how you see it. First of all you have to see it as it is. Pure and plain marketing bull$#@! along the lines of PS2 is a supercomputer. There never was the intention of Sony to support it for 10 years, maybe there was but the decision falls as soon as someone tries to push the next console version. Maybe you might get 10 years out of the PS3, but that will be like the PS2 with third parties supporting it longer than Sony does with official titles.
    But one thing is definitely sure, the PS4 wont be backward compatible to the PS3 unless the processors and graphics chips are an evolution of the current architecture. Given the radical design choices Sony usually does, the chance is very high that it wont be. The architecture is way too complicated to be embedded for a reasonable price in a PS4. The PS2 support was dropped for the same reasons in the PS3 (price)

    So given the history, count on following. PS4 in a 5 years lifespan very likely. PS3 10 years lifespan, I would not count on it remotely. Sony saying it will have a 10 years lifespan. The time Microsoft comes out with the next Xbox all this will be forgotten on Sonys side.

  10. #10
    DCEmu Old Pro mcdougall57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,324
    Rep Power
    70

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Veskgar View Post
    The PS3 hardware is far superior and the fact that it doubles as a Blu-Ray player, supports HDMI, etc. makes it much more desirable to me.
    Doesn't the XBOX have HDMI and have a more powerful GPU? and wont the XBOX 3 have newer and better hardware upon release while the PS3 is still in its lifetime?

    Right now I really want a PS3 for MGS4 but i refuse to buy one for a single game so I'm just gonna have to borrow my cousins PS3 when he's completed it.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •