Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Halo 3 Beats Out GTA IV, Portal, Wii Fit For Edge Innovation Award

                  
   
  1. #11
    DCEmu Rookie
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Age
    38
    Posts
    137
    Rep Power
    67

    Default

    So basically a console game is considered innovative if it manages to accomplish what PC games have done for over a decade, over games that add little bits of things that have never been done in any game before? Does anyone else think Edge has a bit too much bias to be giving awards? The explanation they gave for Halo 3 getting the Innovation Award sounds like it came from a completely different award.

  2. #12
    DCEmu Newbie zelion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    17
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Actually Call of Duty 4 hands-down destroys Halo3's unbalanced matchmaking system

  3. #13
    DCEmu Regular
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    487
    Rep Power
    74

    Default

    Game awards are like the Grammys and don't mean $#@!! All it is is a popularity contest and always will be. There are so many games that get released every year that fly way under the radar. They just don't have the milllion dollar publishers for the advertisement or 70-80 person dev teams. I've played more innovative games on my Amiga made by 2 or 3 people at the most. Reflections has made Driver and some other big title games, but back in the Amiga days they made Shadow of the Beast. It was done by two guys. Everything! That game was so ahead of it's time. That game had innovation. Halo 3...no. I have no idea how an already mediocre FPS game that is a sequel can win an innovation award. The only thing I'll give the game is decent online play and story. It's all been done before. That however doesn't make a game innovative.

  4. #14

    Default

    Hell you might as well have given the award to the Madden Football franchise. Nothing like a roster update spells innovation...oh wait.

  5. #15

    Default

    In terms of gameplay elements, especially single player, it couldn't be much less innovative.
    The multiplayer may work great in terms of matchmaking etc, but I don't see how "new" or "creative" of an idea to that related to past acccomplishments of other games multiplayer; it can certainly be the best, and can be improved, but that doesn't mean it's creative.

  6. #16
    DCEmu Coder
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    190
    Rep Power
    69

    Default

    $#@!, I'm really beginning to get worried about video gaming.

    Because it has these parallels with the Film industry, I suspect the future is going to be filled with "Big Summer Blockbuster sequels" from the big studios rather than games with the emphasis on FUN.

    There is a little glimmer of hope in the form of Nintendo, but the way I see it, the future is going to be filled with copies and revamps rather than innovation.

  7. #17
    DCEmu Regular Airdevil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    274
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sonny_Jim View Post
    $#@!, I'm really beginning to get worried about video gaming.

    Because it has these parallels with the Film industry, I suspect the future is going to be filled with "Big Summer Blockbuster sequels" from the big studios rather than games with the emphasis on FUN.

    There is a little glimmer of hope in the form of Nintendo, but the way I see it, the future is going to be filled with copies and revamps rather than innovation.
    LittleBigPlanet?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •