Why the PS3 is a better system

[Malksta]

well, it all comes down to preference. one man will prefer Gears of War, one man will prefer God of War =)

I own all 3, but I personally prefer PS3 because the exclusive titles are more "for me" and I always fear when using my 360 of the awful red rings

[Spyzius]

Games is what it's about , now xbox have more better games, but I hope SONY will find a way to release more 3th party great games, but not just optimised ports from 360

[Ultima Chocochu]

I just have to put it, it is all a matter of opinion, and I myself prefer the PS3 over the rest.
I just get kind of tired of the "PS3 has no games", either you haven't played it's exclusives or apparently you hate them all, I dunno which yet.
But the majority of First Party Titles have been great, and outdo the competition in my opinion.

On another note however, I hate how certain developers and publishers have treated the PS3 at times, ignoring it and all.

Now let us hope we've got no crazy fanboys starting anything.

[lmtlmt]

i prefer my ps3, i have more games for it than my 360.

[feddon]

ive got a wii and a PS3 but ive spent a bit on time on 360, I prefer the PS3 joypad and wouldnt like to pay for XBlive, i havnt seen many 360 exclusives id call must haves (same with ps3 mind, afew gems aside) most multiplats are slightly better on the 360 but not enough to worry about. I honestly think the blu ray player makes it much more futureproof as a useful item then the xbox. When the xbox 720 and ps4 come around, everyone has a million dvd players but doubt many will have "spare" blu ray players. so as a second console for a different room ps3 is more useful in my eyes. (just think how much your GC gets used if you have a wii for example)

[kaferenza]

I have all three and I personally break it down like this:

If I want to play something simple and fun I play the Wii.
If I want to play something else I play either the 360 or the PS3.
If I want to play something online I play either the PS3 or the Wii.

Game library wise the Wii suffers from having only a few good titles out of a plethora that come out, the 360 has a lot of good titles and a lot of horrible ones as well, and the PS3 has a smaller but growing list of titles that also run the gamut. Nintendo doesn't seem to care who publishes what on their system. Microsoft makes some admittedly smart moves and does things like contracting Bungie. Sony on the other hand has done some really stupid things such as canceling the sequels to Heavenly Sword (the first sold over a million copies). Seriously, anyone play even the first few minutes of Heavenly Sword and can say why they wouldn't want to play more of those games?

Either way I guess the best way to put it is that all consoles have their ups and downs and to rate any system over the other based solely on a single criteria is pointless. How many of you here still have and love their Dreamcasts? How many out of those would say that the Dreamcast sucks because the PS3 has more RAM and it doesn't have Halo or a motion sensing controller? You can argue the criteria of how powerful a system is but that doesn't make it better. Want more proof? Look at how the Atari 2600 (and it's clones) were in production WELL into the NES era and longer.

Guess its just hard for some people not to be fan-boys and to simply take each console as it's own for what it is.

[jrsmaster411]

All the 360 exclusives I even cared about seem to be coming to the PS3 anyways, Microsofts so busy giving money to third parties to keep them away from the ps3 that they forgot to make some good first party games, that's been the most obvious this year when 360 has little to no exclusives coming out, their big titles this year so far have been Halo wars and Ninja Blade, that sums it up, and the argument about PS3 having no good games is completely mute by now, the ps3 has the better exclusives and it has tons of games planned for the next 2 years already