Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Report: Console life cycles grow as big three share the market

                  
   
  1. #1
    Won Hung Lo wraggster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Nottingham, England
    Age
    52
    Posts
    139,938
    Blog Entries
    3209
    Rep Power
    50

    General games Report: Console life cycles grow as big three share the market

    We've heard from a few non-Microsoft sources that the Xbox 360 is heading for an extremely long console cycle, but last week's CES found Microsoft saying exactly that. David Hufford of Xbox product management mentioned during a briefing that the 360 is "the console of the long future for us," and that he doesn't yet know "if we're at the midpoint" of the console's timeline. Which sounds pretty amazing, since the console actually released in 2005, but the numbers support that theory, with adoption only recently passing the rates of the last generation.

    In other words, the mad dash from 8- to 16- to 32- to 64-bit and beyond gaming has apparently relaxed for the moment, and Jack Schofield of The Guardian says it's because all three major companies at the moment (Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo) have all achieved a viable place in the market. Without feeling constant pressure to outdo each other, the major console companies can settle into their own niches and expand their own markets. Which, as Hufford said at CES, is exactly what Microsoft is planning to do in the coming "Natal era."

    http://www.joystiq.com/2010/01/11/re...re-the-market/

  2. #2

    Default

    The Ps3 has the hardware features to justify a 10 year life cycle but the 360's basically just a Xbox 1 with more power so think it's going to struggle, and the Psp was pretty much out dated and needed a proper replacement within 2 years of release.

  3. #3

    Default

    It's the Ps3's Blu-ray, Bluetooth and card slot that makes all the difference for longevity so video card is only a small issue because graphics are close enough, and better graphics equals higher game production costs so developers will be happy with the 360's limitations, i think it was someone in Nintendo that called the 360 the Xbox 1.5 and i do kinda agree.

  4. #4

    Default

    It's just the extra features that give a 10-15 year old console the quality and extras to keep it viable against opposition, the Ps3 is more than i need and i'm very happy with my 360, but the Xbox 1 was more than i needed when i had Ps2 but eventually the extra features gave it the edge for me.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The 2009 eBay Holiday Video Game Grey Market Report [Feature]
    By indiegames in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 1st, 2010, 19:40
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 16th, 2006, 18:40
  3. Xbox 2 could take 30% market share - EB president!
    By wraggster in forum Xbox News Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: June 14th, 2004, 18:27
  4. GameCube market share doubles in Europe!
    By wraggster in forum Nintendo News Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: June 14th, 2004, 18:24

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •