Future-Resurrection v1.3 (new build)

**yaustar** · July 12th, 2006, 20:46

Why? I was making a valid point and backing it up with evidence. I can't even see why it is rude. Even I got slated in one of my 'releases' that was never meant to be a release.
http://pspupdates.qj.net/Lua-RTS-Pro...g/49/aid/54489

Welcome to criticism and the Internet, live with it.

**Crimson_Lotus** · July 12th, 2006, 21:26

Originally Posted by yaustar

Why? I was making a valid point and backing it up with evidence. I can't even see why it is rude. Even I got slated in one of my 'releases' that was never meant to be a release.
http://pspupdates.qj.net/Lua-RTS-Pro...g/49/aid/54489

Welcome to criticism and the Internet, live with it.

I asked nicely... Hoping you would be conciderate.

If you are really in the business of helping us then please take down the link... I am very serious.

-Crimson

**yaustar** · July 12th, 2006, 21:37

Unless there is a valid reason for me to take back my words, I won't. As far as I can see, there is nothing wrong with links given in this thread.

Zion knows that currently I am being considerate as there are a few things about the 1.0 release you may not know about.

**Zion** · July 12th, 2006, 21:48

Don't blackmail me Yaustar. I made it perfectly clear in the mix up about the 1.0 release (on the first post) so feel free to tell everyone you want.

I gunntims and everyone else has got over that except you, so get over it.

And just becuase your game got flamed over at psp-updates, doesnt mean you have to be negative all the time. Either lighten up or please don't post on my threads, i am busy enough as it is without having to defend myself from unnessacary flaming

**yaustar** · July 12th, 2006, 21:53

Oboy. So far, I have not mentioned that incident outside of the original thread. In fact I have helped you by pointing out the areas that need improving from release 1.01 onwards. [E.g. See my First reply in this thread]. I can't even see the blackmail or the threat, I supposedly made.

I am not flaming you or dissing your project. My original point was that development releases should NOT make the front page because of end users do NOT appreicate projects that are 'in progress' and posted links to prove that point. This point applies to ALL projects in progress including my own. End of. There is no underlying message to anything. All my replies should be taken at face value.

At present you are taking all my replies as personal attacks on you and your project. In fact, I can't see anywhere in this thread where I have attacked this project.

Edit: Yes, I did get flamed at PSPupdates and quite frankly I don't care. It was a release made for developers like my collision box example and animation example. This wasn't the first time it has happened to me either. MGS2D was released to a developer site for the GBA with a 40-50 page odd report on the project. Developers loved it because they read the report and appreicated it as it was. It got posted on PDROMs/elsewhere to end users. They didn't care about the report and slated it. That's the difference that I tried to put across which seems to be completely lost by everyone.

**Zion** · July 12th, 2006, 21:57

I know, and appriciate your help yaustar. And i know, i didnt want this to be front page news, not until its playable anyway.

Sorry if i over-reacted.

**yaustar** · July 12th, 2006, 22:17

Ahhh... I now see what the original problem with the link was (why didn't anyone tell me the reason to take down the link?). Changed to a more appropriate link.

**Crimson_Lotus** · July 12th, 2006, 23:53

Originally Posted by yaustar

Ahhh... I now see what the original problem with the link was (why didn't anyone tell me the reason to take down the link?). Changed to a more appropriate link.

Alittle better....