Daedalus R7 Released (Nintendo 64 emulator for the PSP)

**Video_freak** · August 13th, 2006, 23:53

one guy said NTSC was faster, and your saying PAL is gaster

**NoQuarter** · August 13th, 2006, 23:55

Mario64 100mhz:avg 5.5 fps
222 8.5
266 10.5
333 12.5
these are on the bob-omb level

Bear in mind this varies depending on the amount of action onscreen
I tested this from a standstill

**The_Ultimate_Eggman** · August 13th, 2006, 23:56

Great work still gonna wait for decnt fps cant be arsed wit hit stammering and juddering along.once again GREAT !!!!!

**jOeBrO** · August 14th, 2006, 00:03

the PAL version is faster than the NTSC because of the fact that deadalus only has to emulate 50 frames per second instead of 60(NTSC).

So if you were running mario 64 at 10fps on an NTSC version it would be running at 1/6 of fullspeed because it has to mantain a constant 60 frames per second to run fullspeed.

However, if you run a PAL version mario 64 at 10fps, it runs at 1/5 of fullspeed because a PAL version only needs a constant of 50 frames per second to maintain fullspeed.

if you still dont understand there is a noticable difference when comparing them

**Video_freak** · August 14th, 2006, 00:07

i understand. i'll try them both anyways lol

**FrozenIpaq** · August 14th, 2006, 00:07

I'm dissappointed in you wrag, why are you bringing up the "competition" so much in your posts? I wrote the QJ/PSPU article and had it all written for when he did release it - You weren't the only one on Sourceforge looking for the download.

I took the time to make a video for our users to show two games on the emulator, so even if you beat the "competition", you had to sacrafice something - quality...

**NoQuarter** · August 14th, 2006, 00:08

Shadows of the empire crashed psp at lucas arts screen
I'll try changing some settings
nogo definite crash
We really do not need any site war crap on this thread please!