North Korea threatens nuke missile

[Video_freak]

In the words of Gregory, the transfer student who had a 4-0 GPA at Yardale,
"Hold me Wendy, this is bad."

PS: You'll only get this if you saw South Park, Bigger, Longer & Uncut...

[pibs]

bah those koreans and their wacky threats, so they made a Abomb.....the U.S has Hbombs to cause more havoc than those abombs.

but the U.N shud really put those guys in check!

[Kaiser]

North Korea just tested another one according to CTV.

Its all talk.

Yes its all talk, they must have some earthquake machine thats setting off Japan and South Korea's Seismac readers.

[ricflairandy]

Calm down people, there has been no proof atall that korea have actually tested a nuke, aside from their own statements. Wouldnt suprise me if they dont even know what one is. Its all talk.

[dagger89]

Calm down people, there has been no proof atall that korea have actually tested a nuke, aside from their own statements. Wouldnt suprise me if they dont even know what one is. Its all talk.

You are sooooo right.... Low seismic activity and radioactive particles are 100% normal...

[NoQuarter]

There is nothing anbody can do militarily due to the proximity to China,except of course China.Damn, I didn't know they tested another one.This is bad

[Kaiser]

You are sooooo right.... Low seismic activity and radioactive particles are 100% normal...

Yeah I also find it odd that so many people are in denial over this issue.




People need to remember these are only low-powered A-bombs, a far cry from Russian or American Hydrogen powered ICBMs. Which are thousands of times more powerful. The only way the N. Koreans could use these weapons currently is through a bomber (their missile tehchnology is still primative and ineffective). Any bombers would be easily taken down by one of the major powers. N. Korea is just trying to get peopled riled up. They want to be appeased, but it looks like this time the major powers won't submit to these threats and if all go's well we'll have a strict amount of sanctions from the UN. This alone could collapse this already fragile regime if done the right way.

[NoQuarter]

Their economy has been on the brink of collapse for years.This brinkmanship started because we cut off aid to them right?
The worse consequence probably will be an escallation of nuclear proliferation in the area.They are clearly using Pakistan as their model,make nuke get what we want.
Hell a large portion of their income was based on money laundering and bootlegging products which has now been shut off.Maybe that's more of the reason they are trying to strongarm.
This is bad because as nuclear proliferation increases, so do the chances somebody will use one on another country.

Kaiser:
The key IS doing it the right way,if played incorrectly this can be used to play other countries against each other.

[Masta-G]

It's so funny to see people really have faith in their bush-administration. They're similar to Iran keeping the youth on optium so they won't interfere with politics. The awesome US who gave "freedom" to iraq and setting them "free" from saddam's regime right.. If you believe that your an idiot. Instead they made it worse. Violence increased alot since they came to make trouble. More lifes lost then ever. But they dont give a ****.. Even better they're probally supporting the riots and slaughters. Since this way the natives from iraq will never stand together. So the chance they will interfere with pumping the "free" oil back the US is really small.
It's all about money.
If iraq didn't have oil then they would have never started a war in the first place.
But saddam has chemical weapons?
The US sold 'm them that $#@! after ronald reagan's election.
They just used it as an excuse to go on war and steal oil.


And then those nerds come and say... kill every outsider! We're 10 times stronger than anyone... **** everyone with black hair and a beard!
They're all terrorists....
Racism...

[ßüboni¢ $oñic]

N. Korea has an impressive army that takes me right back to the cold war in style and appearence. Huge military parades, missles on trucks, thousands of troops. They have a good chance of taking on most countries' armies. They could take our army on easily in a traditional war because
1. They have very large numbers.
2. High Morale.
3. Better military spending.

If our army had that type of determination like it used to in 1944 it could win in Iraq. If they werent second guessing their leader and making youtube documenteries about the struggle whichg happens to be what they aggreed to do they could tame the insurgency. Like it or not the N.K. army is everything our army should be if we wish to maintain a world force. And I'm tired of hearing about this fragile economy. How do you know? The country is so closed off people who dedicate their lives to espianage cant tell its movements. If the 1998 test had gone better we might not of even had an island nation to make our dreamcasts.. The USSR had a bad economy in 1988 but was still highly powerful. And you can't keep saying all the time "well we can just nuke 'em, we got enough to destroy the world 10× times" because if that were tthe case we wouldnt of had "Vietmalia" in 1993, the Serbs would finally leave Kosovo, and the Iraqi insurgency which is more savage then anything the Imperial Japanese could offer would be crushed. The U.S. will not outright use the bomb. As for sanctions that want work since N.K. will equate that to a decleration of war and respond. The UN should handle it since it has a history of 56 years with this issue. Of all the wars the US will wage this is the most justifiable and opposition like the one we see to Iraq will make the protestor look quite naive and delusional.