[WIP] news about Psx-P

**DPyro** · October 15th, 2006, 20:14

Originally Posted by dagger89

It wasn't leaked... It was released by Yoshi...And PCSX should take legal action

It wasn't released by yoshi. It was released by someone from pspgen.

**kersplatty** · October 15th, 2006, 20:16

but yoshi gave permission for it to be released didnt he? sumin lyk by the tym yoshi told him to release source as well, but by the time yoshi told him maxicgen or wateva his name is had set the timer to release the news when he said so

**MikeDX** · October 15th, 2006, 20:20

Handbags at 100 paces everybody!

**magixien** · October 16th, 2006, 10:33

You're funny sometimes:
'

And PCSX should take legal action'

Why do you think something like that ? Go on the official site and read the anser to Yoshihiro and stop writing for nothing.

Where are you when PACMANFAN released it's version ? His version is coming from PCsx too and source and greets are not given when the release is given. (look link on my initial message)

I add the link to find original message of Pacmanfan release on QJ (i forget to link on my message):

NEWS 1, NEWS2, NEWS 3

PACMANFAN do a good work and open the way to psx emulation. I don't discedit him. I just ask YOU to use the same speaking and thinking with Yoshi emulator. Thanx.

***Darksaviour69*** · October 16th, 2006, 11:02

As we explained it was only by chance that we found that Psx-P was breaking GPL, we did not know about pacmanfans release.

The post is very badly translated, so i found it hard to understand all of it, but it seems that you aresuggesting the whole thing was a plan by wraggs because it would give some sort of advantage to the other psx emu...(how?)

It was one of the staff the pointed out that it was breaking GPL, and so legaly we had to act.

btw you do not have to release the source you have to offer to give to the anyone that asks it ( via any method including emial or snail mail, of the original authers choseing). Its not really that hard to do, so why do yoshihiro refuse to offer the source?

PSX-P can be released as a private beta legaly without releaseing the source.

edit: i would also add that we (dcemu staff) have not flamed Yoshi at any stage

**magixien** · October 17th, 2006, 21:55

Originally Posted by Darksaviour69

It was one of the staff the pointed out that it was breaking GPL, and so legaly we had to act.

just want to know why you don't do the same thing with the version pacmanfan....

It broke the same GPL license.... and now you know that but don't do anything.

Wraggster says that we can affiliate the news about the two emulators. I do. I publish on my forum all your news about PS1P.. But you don't do the same on Psx-P... it is not fair or perhaps I don't understand the word affiliate?. :-)

Just a last news: A news versiion (beta 2) of Psx-P iis going to be released. This time it is not first on my site for Severals reasons...

**dagger89** · October 17th, 2006, 23:51

maxigen: Maybe becasuse we didn't find out til way after it was released that it violated GPL. And congrats about beta 2, what will be forgotten this time? The eboot?

**psiko_scweek** · October 17th, 2006, 23:54

What I guess Maxigen is trying to say is that you can still download PacManFans version even though it violates GPL as well.

**Cloudhunter** · October 18th, 2006, 00:17

Originally Posted by dagger89

maxigen: Maybe becasuse we didn't find out til way after it was released that it violated GPL. And congrats about beta 2, what will be forgotten this time? The eboot?

dagger89, stop with the flaming please. Every topic i've seen mentioning the coder has had you spouting useless rubbish all over the place. Just grow up.

Cloudy