Reply With Quotethey dont know wut extra footege to add i guess, but that would be cool
Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
October 20th, 2006, 21:52 #1Won Hung Lo
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- Nottingham, England
- Age
- 53
- Posts
- 141,433
- Blog Entries
- 3209
- Rep Power
- 50
Why didnt they make an extended version of Goblet of Fire
I loved the way with the Lord of the rings films you had the extended versions with at least 40 minutes of extra footage, why didnt they do the same with goblet of fire and prisoner of azkeban.
for a true harry potter fan the longer the better
-
October 20th, 2006, 22:23 #2DCEmu Newbie
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 52
- Rep Power
- 0
-
October 21st, 2006, 00:30 #3Won Hung Lo
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- Nottingham, England
- Age
- 53
- Posts
- 141,433
- Blog Entries
- 3209
- Rep Power
- 50
theres so much more in the Book it could have easily been a 4 hour film,
-
October 21st, 2006, 03:06 #4DCEmu Newbie
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 2
- Rep Power
- 0
they should actually had the Quidditch world cup in there also they left out alot of other things
-
November 21st, 2006, 18:10 #5PSP User
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Bottom of The Pit
- Posts
- 1,542
- Rep Power
- 80
Maybe they just didn't have that much footage left out...
-
March 10th, 2007, 05:48 #6
long films don't always hold peoples attention, I would get bored sitting in a cinema watching films that are 3+ hours (I fall asleep through 2hour movies)
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks