PS3 sold for $0.99

**DEADLIFE** · November 23rd, 2006, 17:27

what an idiot

**Napalm-Death** · November 23rd, 2006, 17:33

I feel bad for him...hopefully he can fix the situation. But honestly, if I were the buyer, I'd freaking take it.

**Hawq** · November 23rd, 2006, 18:54

If only I'd seen that in decent time, of course I woulda had to get an american to ship it but dear god it would mark the bargain of the year. I say this purely out of anger at $ony's delay untill march for a lot of us

**VampDude** · November 23rd, 2006, 21:34

lmfao, all I can say is good luck to whoever got it...

...he probably thought he was smart putting his PS3 up for auction hoping to make a proffit, he should've checked the item description before he put it up!

what a loser, he should'nt of bought a PS3 if he did'nt want it in the first place!

:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:

**F9zDark** · November 23rd, 2006, 22:19

Originally Posted by VampDude

lmfao, all I can say is good luck to whoever got it...

...he probably thought he was smart putting his PS3 up for auction hoping to make a proffit, he should've checked the item description before he put it up!

what a loser, he should'nt of bought a PS3 if he did'nt want it in the first place!

-minus all the gay smilies-

He doesn't have 1 PS3, he has 4 of them. If you check the Ebay auction page he has a picture of 4 PS3 boxes sitting next to each other. So I kinda don't feel bad for him that this happened (he had more $2400 to burn on gaming? and he managed to sell one for .99 cents? Cry me a river...)

If he had only 1 PS3 I'd feel bad for him. Even though the loss is regrettable, he can still make some damn good money on the other systems, assuming he doesn't screw up again.

**shadowprophet** · November 23rd, 2006, 22:22

mishaps like this in general are not ( but this this extent I suppose it is rare) as umcommon as one would think.

There should really be an escape clause to the entire buyer seller contract from the start anyway
to cover such acidents as this. i suppose though if there where people would just exploit it..

**F9zDark** · November 23rd, 2006, 22:29

Originally Posted by shadowprophet

mishaps like this in general are not ( but this this extent I suppose it is rare) as umcommon as one would think.

There should really be an escape clause to the entire buyer seller contract from the start anyway
to cover such acidents as this. i suppose though if there where people would just exploit it..

Exactly. And everytime an item fluctuated in price, people would close down the auction to relist it at a more expensive price.

This person should have checked everything, 5 times if necessary and had a friend come over and check it out as well.

But he was probably in a dumb rush, so happy to earn big bucks on PS3 that he didn't check anything to make sure it was right. While this kind of mishap is understandable (equally stupid things happen to everyone), he still should have had someone to check it for him.

**superzapper** · November 24th, 2006, 16:04

You don't have to send the unit .It's an obvious mistake and the buyer would be a complete wanker to expect this guy to part with a PS3 for 99 cents.The seller would get a revoked auction mark against him if he didn't send the unit but it's not like you could go to jail or anything.