Metal Gear Solid is simply an example of an action game more heavily based on steath than action. There had been stealth games prior to it, and there had been 3d action games before it. There had even been 3d action games with stealth elements before it, it simply put them all together.
FF7 as far as I'm concerned was just a graphically poor 3D rpg. I can't think of anything that it specifically introduced into gaming that had not existed prior and wouldn't exist without it (there were already rpgs to use 3D, although I would cede that it may have been the first 'all 3D'[not really, since it uses pre-rendered(2D) backgrounds] I would never say that without the playstation or FF7 there would not have existed a 3D RPG). In fact without the playstation we probably would have received FF 5 and 6 on SNES in america, then more delicious FF goodness on the N64.
So, with what I'm arguing (inovation) those two are for the most part out. In my examples I leave out everything past the Dreamcast. Now I'm shocked you didn't bring up one of the only games I would say was completely innovative for the PS: Vib Ribbon.
Now at the same time, I'd stress that we're talking mostly about hardware here. The Playstation specifically had very little to it's name other than the fact that sony was able to sell so many of them. It couldn't do 2D well, it couldnt' do 3D well, it only had 2 controller ports, it had no built in memory (seriously, that to me is one huge oversight cut probably for cost/forcing people to buy accessorie), it never had any kind of netplay feature (you can still play Daytona online with your saturn), it wasn't the first CD system, and it wasn't even the first system released within it's 'generation'.
People always overlook that the BIGGEST reason for the success of the Playstation is that sony really wanted to get into the business, had the money to sell it for dirt cheap(and it showed), and had the know-how to produce great hype and advertising for it.
edit: figured I'd add a small thought: The playstation was a good all around machine. It was simple, it just did 3D and at the time it did it fairly well. From everything I've ever seen though, it was not and is not the best in any single category. Given the choice of every console released prior to the Dreamcast, would you name the PS as THE CONSOLE to get for any single genre of game? The only ONLY one I can think of is the music style game, DDR, guitar freak, etc. Everything else, RPG (snes), 3D platformer (n64), 2D fighter (Sat), shump (Sat), arcade ports (sat), extremely fast paced 2d games (genesis), etc etc.
I think that is something that needs to be taken strongly into account when discussing the innovation of a piece of hardware: "what did it do that it did the best?"
Bookmarks