
Originally Posted by
Tetris999
Ok let me elborate on this whole steal the art thing
Now quzar said
"It's sad that you choose to show homage by stealing intellectual property."
yes very good choice of words, but infact they are pretty off
To start there are many, many games being released. Some people, who are what we call "fans" decide they want to make a type of clone of the game. Now the person does take art work from the original game to make the game. So far so good. the person is, obviously not using it for any commercial benfit rather its enjoyment. Now Nintendo does copyright there things, but how come there are so many flash games and other types of games that may be familiar to the original. Well if i could explain this in the ending credits of any nintendo game it says " the game, music and something else, i need find out what it says is copyrighted by nintendo" now if we go into this copyright, it only applies to if the person uses the actual game for commercial benefit S-O what zion has done here was make a clone of zelda, true he used the art work
but, nevertheless he did code it all. Now what he did was use art, am i correct?YES
He did use the concept of the game am i correct? YES, BUT is he selling to us? NO
AND DID HE START THE CODING OF THE GAME HIMSELF? Y-E-S
There is no commercial game being made here, some ripped graphics of a game, which are copyrighted only against commercial use, So everbody lets use our common sense please, give the credit for the coding of this game, whereas u dont need to say "great artwork zion"
This is zions game, just not his graphics
So in the end my freind quzar, what you said was very futile, i must describe it as stupid
and if you are trying to provide insight on a game, saying its artwork is ripped is very obvious and its not like anyone can think for themselves
And if im not blind zion gave CREDITS for the SPRITES
Bookmarks