PS3 won't emulate PS2's success

[808]

F9zDark, the Dreamcast is better than the PS3 will ever be. End of story.

Wow, another well thought out and coherent post that makes perfectly good sense, with strong factual evidence to back it up and without any bias or opinion!

[Uchuu]

the wii uses dual layer dvds so get your facts right Uchuu.

Oops, my bad, just did a net search and found out that it was. Yea, 4.7GB single layered, 8.5GB dual......sounds like an ample amount of space for the Wii, considering it doesn't need that much data for graphics and what not.

Hmm.......maybe the Wii doesn't have that many limitations afterall (other than the fact that the games so far look like last gen games....should get better though).

F9zDark, the Dreamcast is better than the PS3 will ever be. End of story.

please explain this to me......really i want to know HOW the DC is better than the PS3 will ever be.

[F9zDark]

F9zDark, the Dreamcast is better than the PS3 will ever be. End of story.

Right. Stop spouting your opinion as fact, no body likes that around here and such is detrimental to a good discussion. As I have said numerous times, if the DC was better than any other console, even those from its generation, it wouldn't be in the grave, relegated to the few, annual Japan only game releases.

How else is it better? Performance? Power potential? User base?

I suppose the real question is, why do I bother to entertain your post when it has no relevance or evidence to back up your claim? If Dreamcasts were selling by the truck load to this day, then I can see that maybe you'd have a valid point; but they aren't. And probably haven't for the last 6-7 years.

[1stvinicius]

Right. Stop spouting your opinion as fact, no body likes that around here and such is detrimental to a good discussion. As I have said numerous times, if the DC was better than any other console, even those from its generation, it wouldn't be in the grave, relegated to the few, annual Japan only game releases.

How else is it better? Performance? Power potential? User base?

I suppose the real question is, why do I bother to entertain your post when it has no relevance or evidence to back up your claim? If Dreamcasts were selling by the truck load to this day, then I can see that maybe you'd have a valid point; but they aren't. And probably haven't for the last 6-7 years.

:rofl: You didnt get it, did you?? He was just steping on your foot.. Was just throwing an absurd sentence to see your reaction, big dude HEHEheeaehueh LOL He may be laughing at your face right now heheh. Just like me HUEAEOLFOOEAEEEAEAA :thumbup:

[F9zDark]

:rofl: You didnt get it, did you?? He was just steping on your foot.. Was just throwing an absurd sentence to see your reaction, big dude HEHEheeaehueh LOL He may be laughing at your face right now heheh. Just like me HUEAEOLFOOEAEEEAEAA :thumbup:

Laugh it up all you want I really don't care about something as trivial as that. Really, spending the time to say some unconstructive and down right wrong is more a laughable offense than proving with evidence that said statement is wrong.

Such is why the internet has a long ways to go before it ever becomes a true medium for intelligent discussion. Because the idiots out there find the need to undermine intelligent discussion with down right lies and try to 'get a laugh' at the sake of their own intelligence (or lack thereof).

So go on laughing my friend, and know that your laughing is born out of your own idiocy.