Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: More Info Hits On Gimped PAL PS3

                  
   
  1. #1
    Won Hung Lo wraggster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Nottingham, England
    Age
    53
    Posts
    141,446
    Blog Entries
    3209
    Rep Power
    50

    ps3 More Info Hits On Gimped PAL PS3

    Well, slightly more. Last month, we reported that the PAL PS3 was going to come up rather short. The console's innards will be different from ones sitting around Japan and the US, and the machine PS2 backwards compatability will be, and we quote, "limited." But with the TV division finally turning a profit, and Sony losing money on each PS3 sold, it's time to cut games costs. And cut 'em for PAL regions!

    Today in Tokyo, Sony pretty much riterated what we've heard before: The PAL PS3 won't carry the microchip that dishes up PS2 data and graphic processing functions. Instead, it will be outfitted with a different chip altogether — A cheaper, crappy chip that will lower the console's BC.

    What's more, Sony aims to roll out Cell chips with a smaller circuity width (the new ones will be 65-nanometers as compared to the current 90-nano ones). Narrow circuitry means smaller chips, lowering production costs. Not sure how that will effect quality. Japanese investors were happy by today's announcement as company shares rose 3 percent. But what do gamers in PAL regions think? Oh, right. They're pissed!

    via kotaku

  2. #2
    DCEmu Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    26
    Rep Power
    0

    Exclamation

    Well first of all the PS3 won't use any chip to emulate the PS1 or PS2 it will be emulated by software, for the smaller chip it's good news...because it won't get the CPU to overheat, this new CPU/PS3 will be cooler than the rest of the others.
    The only bad news there is until now is the missing Chip Emotion Engine.

  3. #3
    PS Beta Tester & Mod DPyro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Right Behind You!
    Posts
    2,742
    Rep Power
    86

    Default

    They should have done this from the beginning.

  4. #4
    Nightmaren Shrygue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Kojima Shinden
    Posts
    12,936
    Rep Power
    131

    Default

    Indeed.

  5. #5
    DCEmu Newbie Psumoni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    20
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Call me crazy, but don't you think they might actually sell 2-3 PS2 games to owners of PS3's?

    Seems full PS2 compatibility would pay for itself.

  6. #6
    DCEmu Old Pro mavsman4457's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    East Coast, USA
    Posts
    1,278
    Rep Power
    75

    Default

    I can't imagine that it would be too difficult to fix up the software so that most of the PS2 games are compatible on PS3. It's just a matter of time I think.

  7. #7
    DCEmu Newsposter Triv1um's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Derby, UK
    Age
    33
    Posts
    3,200
    Rep Power
    131

    Default

    lets say sony was a sandwich company -

    the new cheese sandwich

    jap model comes with -
    bread
    butter
    cheese

    costs £100

    they are releasing it in europe

    europes cheese sandwich comes with -
    bread

    and it costs £1000

    obviously the ps3 is like a sandwich

    its not fair.
    PSN (PS3/PS4/Vita)/NintendoID - Triv1umx
    Steam - Rjinswand
    Runescape - Rjinswand

  8. #8
    DCEmu Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,355
    Rep Power
    82

    Default

    We have known for quite some time that Sony was going to phase out the PS2 chip in favor of a software solution. Sadly they chose Europe as the first adopters of software. But is it really something to complain about?

    Software is better in the long run and eventually (probably in the next 6 months) all said BC issues will be solved and us in Japan and America would have paid for something that isn't even utilized anymore.

    Obviously it sucks to pay more for less, as our fellows in Europe are forced to do and I still firmly believe Sony should have waited until March to do a worldwide launch, but thats not how the cards were played.

  9. #9
    DCEmu Rookie
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    137
    Rep Power
    72

    Default

    65nm tech is better in every regard... the post makes it sound like its a bad thing

    and i wouldnt mind about the lack of emotion chip if there was a price cut to reflect it... but there isnt.

    just knock that 25 quid off and make it a round 400... that seems alot more tempting to me.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •