i am having a serious problem and need some help!

[SnesR0X]

meeesa B.C. too......

and no dude i had people coming to my school last year saying 17 and under is not giving consent

too late
:rofl:

Edit: Well that's weird, because they friggin give out condoms in sex ed, so ha!

[Tetris999]

too late
:rofl:

???????????

[SnesR0X]

???????????

what do think i ment?...

[quzar]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of...America#Canada

I was wrong about "all states" in my prior post, but it is still the case in most states that there is a "close in age" exemption.

[SnesR0X]

Thanks Quzar

[Tetris999]

what do think i ment?...

i dunno u tell me

[SnesR0X]

EHHHHH WRONG

i live in canada too kaiser and i have seen the rules (they were presented in class for the teenagers who wanna go hump hump)

anyway, consent CANNOT be given when you are under the age of 18

or at least thats my province

(

Well, I have, big woop, wanna fight about it?

[joshisposer]

He played patty cake with the girl and wore gloves tetris. IN the U.S. it doesn't make sense with the 18 year old law. I mean, every year in the newspaper, they report over 50% of highschool teens having or have had sex. That doesn't include the ones that don't say it. I mean, if that doesn't convince them, i don't know what will. I'm a virgin and some people find that weird for me, but i'm like meh, i'm not a hit and quit person. Unless she is ultra, i want the girl to be someone i feel will stay with me more than 3 months...

[Kaiser]

EHHHHH WRONG

i live in canada too kaiser and i have seen the rules (they were presented in class for the teenagers who wanna go hump hump)

anyway, consent CANNOT be given when you are under the age of 18

or at least thats my province

and BTW the police and stuff love canning people in jail and they dont give a $#@! if you $#@! or not

if you know what i mean, trying to explain what "you werent doing wrong" doesnt always convince the judge (or have u ever seen it work?)

and in the end, without having consent,you do go to court

Now I know thats bull$#@!. Canada has always had lax laws related to such social issues. Even in "conservative" Alberta (where I live).

Quzar even pointed out the wiki article. Our laws are a little blurry in parts that might make it appear otherwise. British common law has never been set in stone as say, civil law in the republican form. No serious court would punish you for having consenting sex at age 18 with a 17 year old though. It would be proven (and has been proven) unconstitutional in a moments notice even if a charge was layed (another extremely unlikely thing to happen).

[Tetris999]

Now I know thats bull$#@!. Canada has always had lax laws related to such social issues. Even in "conservative" Alberta (where I live).

Quzar even pointed out the wiki article. Our laws are a little blurry in parts that might make it appear otherwise. British common law has never been set in stone as civil law. No serious court would punish you for having consenting sex at age 16 or 17. It would be proven (and has been proven) unconstitutional in a moment.

Additionally, section 159 of the Criminal Code sets the age of consent for anal intercourse at 18 years, with an exception if the two partners are married. Section 159 ostensibly sets an unfettered age of consent for male homosexual activity at 18.