Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: Rumours of a playstaion emulator

                  
   
  1. #11
    DCEmu Legend Cap'n 1time's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Right behind you...
    Age
    37
    Posts
    4,547
    Rep Power
    121

    Default

    yup, it might just be some kind of image saved on the psp to display the picture. not too advance. anyways, sadly thats got to be a fake.

  2. #12
    PSP User aseddon130's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Wigan - EU Capital Of Pies
    Age
    40
    Posts
    362
    Rep Power
    75

    Default

    definately a fake, they took this pic http://homepage2.nifty.com/shinu/cvgs/cvgsmac/ff7.gif and added the text at the side then put it on the PSP to 'look' like an emulator ...

    wonder if it works on a 1.5 :s

  3. #13
    Dream Coder
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Age
    38
    Posts
    4,675
    Rep Power
    50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nexis2600
    You cant just clearly say

    "well since snes is not running at 60fps, ps1 is then not posible"

    This is extreamly false. A emulator speed is based on how well it was writen. Sure the psx is a more complex system to emulate but the snes emu is also based on snes9x which I feel happens to have very slow code.
    He never said that. He simply said it is probably fake due to the fact that NES and SNES still arent all that fast. Both of which make sense. SNES9X is actually fairly fast, the only problem is that you are probably comparing it to zsnes which is written in assembly, its like comparing apples and oranges.

    That being said, I also think that it is unlikely that someone has a full speed psx emulator running on the psp. The only very portable ps emulator out there is PCSX and it is very very slow, and if they had been writing it from scratch I don't think that it would be possible to have any playstation games actually running yet, since as far as i know, 3d hasnt been figured out yet, only framebuffer writing, which would mean that it would have to be a fully software emulator.

  4. #14
    DCEmu Coder
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Portugal
    Age
    47
    Posts
    93
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Hi

    Still, its more easy to have a PSX emu in 'C' runing faster then a SNES 'C' emu whole due to the Timing on the SNES emu's that have to be very accurate to run lots of games. The same goes with Assembly(thou, with Asm some tricks can be used).

    -Mekanaizer-
    &&
    Don't dream, play DreamCast!!!

  5. #15
    DCEmu Legend Cap'n 1time's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Right behind you...
    Age
    37
    Posts
    4,547
    Rep Power
    121

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by quzar
    He never said that. He simply said it is probably fake due to the fact that NES and SNES still arent all that fast. Both of which make sense. SNES9X is actually fairly fast, the only problem is that you are probably comparing it to zsnes which is written in assembly, its like comparing apples and oranges.

    That being said, I also think that it is unlikely that someone has a full speed psx emulator running on the psp. The only very portable ps emulator out there is PCSX and it is very very slow, and if they had been writing it from scratch I don't think that it would be possible to have any playstation games actually running yet, since as far as i know, 3d hasnt been figured out yet, only framebuffer writing, which would mean that it would have to be a fully software emulator.

    never seen you make a post thats so tough on a fellow coder. anyways its pretty much been proven that its a fake by now, this topic really should be locked as to prevent some meaningless arguments that often occur for no apparent reason.

  6. #16
    NGPSP Author
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    226
    Rep Power
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by quzar
    He never said that. He simply said it is probably fake due to the fact that NES and SNES still arent all that fast. Both of which make sense. SNES9X is actually fairly fast, the only problem is that you are probably comparing it to zsnes which is written in assembly, its like comparing apples and oranges.
    Its much more then that and Snes9X is still not fairly fast. Look at that as well. The avalible NES emu runs poorly compaired to the GBC emulator which runs pretty solid.


    Quote Originally Posted by quzar
    That being said, I also think that it is unlikely that someone has a full speed psx emulator running on the psp. The only very portable ps emulator out there is PCSX and it is very very slow, and if they had been writing it from scratch I don't think that it would be possible to have any playstation games actually running yet, since as far as i know, 3d hasnt been figured out yet, only framebuffer writing, which would mean that it would have to be a fully software emulator.
    http://fpsearm.psxfanatics.com/

    I watched this emulator, which is a port of a pc emu by the way, from the start and in it's early days it was getting 40fps on quite a few games. Not to mention Pocket PC lack 3d accelleration.

    There are also more things that will lend to a ps1 emulator being posible at faster framerate then ps1 mostly in the cpu. Both systems have mips cpu cores which will make emulation easy and have less pit falls.

    A small pitfall (that is eating up speed) on ngPsp is the fact I have to allign all memory access and the whole core heavly uses the emu's memory routines. This of course wont be a problem on the ps1 since it already works with everything alligned.

  7. #17
    PSP User ganon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    506
    Rep Power
    77

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by quzar
    He never said that. He simply said it is probably fake due to the fact that NES and SNES still arent all that fast. Both of which make sense. SNES9X is actually fairly fast, the only problem is that you are probably comparing it to zsnes which is written in assembly, its like comparing apples and oranges.

    That being said, I also think that it is unlikely that someone has a full speed psx emulator running on the psp. The only very portable ps emulator out there is PCSX and it is very very slow, and if they had been writing it from scratch I don't think that it would be possible to have any playstation games actually running yet, since as far as i know, 3d hasnt been figured out yet, only framebuffer writing, which would mean that it would have to be a fully software emulator.
    thanks 4 explaining

  8. #18
    DCEmu Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    San Antonio,TX ,USA
    Age
    42
    Posts
    14
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1timeuser

    It just dawned upon me that that is FF7- which was about 700megs per disk... do they make mem cards that big for psp?
    I don't doubt that this pic is a fake but just an fyi http://www.memorystick.com/en/msnews/msupdate/36_1.html
    it is possible to put all that onto a memory stick.

  9. #19

    Default

    Who would want to spend double the price of the psp if not more for a mere 4 gigs? Thanks but no thanks I'll pass

  10. #20
    NGPSP Author
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    226
    Rep Power
    73

    Default

    Jesus christ people.

    Research. There is a PS1 emulator (I posted the link above) for Pocket PC. It uses a form of ripping uneeded data (movies, CDA, XA) and zlib compression to compress full ps1 games down to less then 32 megs on 1/3 of the titles out there.

    There wont be a need for a 2GB or 4GB unless you want to keep the full cd uncompressed but on many games it's just stupid (like a fighter, you dont need the movies).

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •