Girls are best at gaming

[dark heart]

NOBODY CARES. now go back and make some better news "the sun"! --worst news ever-- (as far as i know.)

[XioN980]

Shatter: You misunderstand what i mean, you see, i tread genders EQUALLY, i dont believe feminsists are STUPID i believe they are so ARROGANT that they become IGNORANT, you dont seem to be able to read between the lines

also Are you a man or a woman? cos not all the girls i know like feminism at all, they also believe it is overrated.

Why is it that we only have violence against women laws?

Because its bat to beat a woman you may say...

But of course it is NEVER provoked is it
And doesn't that sorta contradict the whole point of feminism?

Also the fact that feminists brought in these laws in australia, and not violence against men laws as well, is also defiant of the feminist cause

I havn't lost at life at all, i and i still think modern-feminism is completely self contradictory, not at all what original feminism started out as, and you contribute to this.

Kepp your snake in its cage.... DYKE

BTW: Its spelt Mile MILE no "d" twit

[gdf]

ehh.. the study said 2/3 between 25-45. MY ARSE. my mum and all her friends have played singstar like once. why are there not many women on online games or websites? because none of them play! i have nothing against women gamers but this study is clearly just a heap of $#@!. it is sorta like saying "not only do men like to shop for clothes MORE than women, they also spend more money at it!"

[Mc_Logical]

lol women may be more intellectually prepared than men, but men have faster reactions and response to things, resulting we will prob kick ass lol but who cares really?

[Shatter]

Shatter: You misunderstand what i mean, you see, i tread genders EQUALLY, i dont believe feminsists are STUPID i believe they are so ARROGANT that they become IGNORANT, you dont seem to be able to read between the lines

also Are you a man or a woman? cos not all the girls i know like feminism at all, they also believe it is overrated.

Why is it that we only have violence against women laws?

Because its bat to beat a woman you may say...

But of course it is NEVER provoked is it
And doesn't that sorta contradict the whole point of feminism?

Also the fact that feminists brought in these laws in australia, and not violence against men laws as well, is also defiant of the feminist cause

I havn't lost at life at all, i and i still think modern-feminism is completely self contradictory, not at all what original feminism started out as, and you contribute to this.

Kepp your snake in its cage.... DYKE

BTW: Its spelt Mile MILE no "d" twit

...let's not get started on grammar, shall we? For someone with multitudes of typos in his own typing, it's not good buisness. But I get off topic.

1.) There are not just 'violence against women' laws. Domestic violence applies to everyone. Children, husband, wife - everyone. It's a common misconception that only women are protected, simply because it is more common for a woman to be abused than a man. Not that it doesn't happen, just not as often.

Never provoked, is it? Oh, of course. Burning her man's meal? Bitch needs a fat lip - that'll teach her. Beatings are never justified on either end, except in self defense. Other than that? No. No, it's never provoked. There is nothing you can do or say that should be replied with a strike - unless you are in danger of being harmed. Speaking as a girl with some anger issues, this is a very hard lesson to learn. But that doesn't change the truth. Tell me, how does a woman 'provoke' a strike? What, she doesn't want sex tonight? She shouts at her hubby for some dumb mistake, even though she knows it was just a mistake, but it's been a really long day and she takes it out on him? That's wrong. She should apologize. Because that's wrong to do, too. But there is never, never any need for causing harm. So, no, you ****ing idiot, it's never provoked.

Although, I would like to hear how you say it can be deserved. Let's see you back that statement up, boy.

I'm not a feminist myself. And I think the cause has sort of run its course - not that we don't have farther to go, but just because the hard-core feminists are so ridiculously militant about it that I can't take them seriously. I believe women should have equal rights - so I suppose in that way, I'm a feminist - but I'm not on the "OMG MEN = TEH GREAT OPPRESSORS! RAARR!" bandwagon.

But please, do respond with how a woman can 'provoke' a strike. Not just make a guy angry, but actually deserve to be hit. Neither a husband nor his wife should ever lay harm on the other.

[El Stefio]

I'm just amazed that anyone actually gives a toss what the Sun has to say about anything...

[megalodon]

I'd really like to have some more normal, sane, girl-gamers. My ex was a girl-gamer that was ten times better than me in FPS's and any fast-paced game, but if I beat her even ONCE in a given game, she would disconnect, and never play with me again in that particular game. She was also quite a bit of a nut-job, I'm afraid, and I'm not saying that just because she is my ex. Thank god my current girlfriend is not a gamer.

But that is really not the point here. Saying that most girl-gamers are better at games because: “They are more intellectually prepared than men.” is just sexist and is exactly like all those monkies here screaming: "women belong in the kitchen!!!", only this time, it's pseudo-scientific.

[Hungry Horace]

I'm just amazed that anyone actually gives a toss what the Sun has to say about anything...

unfortunately there are a lot of people too lazy (and sometimes stupid) to read anything else and/or form their own opinions.

whilst i think the statistic is dumb (you can prove anything you like with stats) surely a male / female divide is something that we all want to break down?
this "articile" (if 3 lines counts as an article these days) does nothing but promote the somewhat tragic behaviour we've seen here.


i've played many of my friends at games and some girls and better at some games than me, and others are a bit rubbish. It's all down to the individual in the end.

[gutbub]

hey, did u guys notice the study is based on 2,000 people?
2,000 out of 6,000,000,000
is that even a half of a percent?

[Psyberjock]

Shatter: You misunderstand what i mean, you see, i tread genders EQUALLY, i dont believe feminsists are STUPID i believe they are so ARROGANT that they become IGNORANT, you dont seem to be able to read between the lines

also Are you a man or a woman? cos not all the girls i know like feminism at all, they also believe it is overrated.

Why is it that we only have violence against women laws?

Because its bat to beat a woman you may say...

But of course it is NEVER provoked is it
And doesn't that sorta contradict the whole point of feminism?

Also the fact that feminists brought in these laws in australia, and not violence against men laws as well, is also defiant of the feminist cause

I havn't lost at life at all, i and i still think modern-feminism is completely self contradictory, not at all what original feminism started out as, and you contribute to this.

Kepp your snake in its cage.... DYKE

BTW: Its spelt Mile MILE no "d" twit

Woah woah woah there buddy.... You're going a little overboard here. Why are you flaming Shatter? Cause she's witty and makes you feel insecure?

Chill out, you're single-handedly proving your own case against yourself. You're like judge, jury, prosecution, defense, AND executioner all wrapped up into one.

Are you really even a coder? What have you coded? I'll immediately stop using that program if it's on my PSP. I don't want to even be remotely connected to the crazy ideas you're cooking up.