That extensive cost is only if we want to sell the thing commercially.
i have a friend who knows alot about microprocessors, i should of asked him before.
Well, I guess infrared is the way we'll have to go. After emailing my dad, I got the following response:
RF (Radio Frequency) devices are very expensive to start out with. In order to legally use and sell them, they must go through a series of FCC "type-testing" which takes a lot of time and money. Everything sold in this country that radiates radio frequencies must be type-tested. I'd say that it would cost between $10,000 and $25,000 by the time you got something ready for sale.
The only real drawback to infrared is the line-of-sight requirement. In general it would also be cheaper than RF. Based on price, you should also be able to get better bandwidth, or speed, using infrared. This would be important if you are trying to send the analog data you mentioned.
Whether using RF or infrared, most standard communication protocols will easily let you work with 8 to 32 remote devices into a single receiver-transmitter. Each remote would have a transmitter and receiver, as would the "base station" (or whatever you might want to call it).
Generally they are referred to as master and slave devices. The slaves ask to be acknowledged and when the master gives permisssion, the slaves send their data, along with some type of verification code. The master then compares the data with the verification code. If they agree, the master accepts the data and processes it. If the master misses part of the transmission from the slave, it asks the slave to resend the data. Even a slow system can process thousands of these transfers per second.
There are various protocols that determine in what order the slaves can be acknowledged. You can use "polling" where each slave is polled every few thousands or millionths of a second, or a slave can set a "flag" Once the flag is set, the master knows that a slave is waiting to talk. There are also interrupt driven systems, where certain slaves, or certain types of communication take precedence over other slaves. If their priority is high enough, they can "interrupt" whatever else is going on. Because of the speed of the communication (with infrared, generally several million cycles per second), the masters and slaves are mostly in an idle state.
You need to find a friend who is into microprocessors.
DCHelp - A Newbie's Best Friend
DC Evolution - Disc Images
The DreamZone Forums
I Refuse To Help Anyone That Says They've Tried Everything.
That extensive cost is only if we want to sell the thing commercially.
i have a friend who knows alot about microprocessors, i should of asked him before.
Yeah - I wasn't sure about the cost if we weren't going with it commercially (which we obviously wouldn't).
Hopefully your friend will have some good stuff to tell us.
DCHelp - A Newbie's Best Friend
DC Evolution - Disc Images
The DreamZone Forums
I Refuse To Help Anyone That Says They've Tried Everything.
Docs made dc wireless controllers
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...Name=WDVW&rd=1
Yes, but we want to modify stock controller's to work wirelessly, were aware of already existing commercial wireless controllers.
Any updates here? I'd love to do something like this.
I'm slowly getting somewhere, the friend knew nothing about this but said to check the Maplins catalogue as he says it always seems to show an answer when he's stuck for a solution
Sure enough, flicking through i saw some IR encoders and decoders, these should work perfectly with sending the signal to the DC, and i'm looking into how to send a signal back for the VMU. In the meantime i'll build the circuit needed using those two IC's should be a nice simple circuit.
This aside, i don't really like IR, it's unreliable and more open to interence, plus you have a shorter range, but using radio waves like a GameCube wavebird uses seems much more complicated. So im stuck with IR.
What's the max range you can get with IR?Originally Posted by ptr.exe
And doesn't it have to be more or less line of sight?
The range varies on the setup, but it's easily more than 5 metres, which is plenty. Depending on the IR diode used you can have it that you're facing the other way to the DC and it'll still work, you just use one with a wide viewing angle.
So seeing as you've been working on this a bit, do you think we'll actually be able to fit all of the components inside of the standard controller casing? What about powering the transmiter? Somehow adding batteries to the DC controller?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks