Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Thread: Do you guys like nirvana

                  
   
  1. #31
    DCEmu Legend ICE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    35
    Posts
    3,697
    Blog Entries
    6
    Rep Power
    111

    Default

    ive never seen a guy smoke and sing at the same time..

    anywho they played "baby music" on purpose. they wanted to keep it simple and focus on melody. they had some of the most unique songs since oh i dunno the pixies.

  2. #32
    Dreamcast User Dull Blade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canadia
    Posts
    420
    Rep Power
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bah View Post
    I'm just glad I grew up before the goths cross bred with the new-age 'punks' and gave birth to the whole emo crowd.
    Who would of ever thought two not too bad groups people could turn into such a disaster. I like alot of punk music and alot of goth music. It like they took all the worst qualities of those groups formed them together, found it wasn't bad enough and decided to get some more bad qualities to put into. Thats EMO in a nut shell.

    Anyways, I like Nirvana. I have a few of their cds but I dont lie their over used songs like "Smells like teen spirit". I liked it at first but just like kurt i grew sick of it.

  3. #33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bah View Post
    I'm just glad I grew up before the goths cross bred with the new-age 'punks' and gave birth to the whole emo crowd.
    Thanks to Nirvana and their untalented, sad, ugly music, you see a lot of emos. Also I saw a lot of emos listening Nirvana.
    I miss the 80's, when the people enjoyed the life.


  4. #34
    DCEmu Old Pro pt9087's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    England, Hull
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,331
    Rep Power
    84

    Default

    Nirvana were crap! FFAF are the new age!

  5. #35
    DCEmu Old Pro bah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,671
    Rep Power
    80

    Default

    Perhaps mainstream music was more 'cheery' in the 80s, but it was surely no less hollow and commercialized.

    Listening to culture club or blondie (later, disco style blondie) wouldn't be making me any happier than 90s rock. The clash were great.

    Nirvana became probably the most commercial rock band of the early 90s. Not in a guns n roses schlock rock way, but in the level of production, promotion and attention the lables were giving to the genre at the time.

    But they still had some great songs.

    Blaming nirvana for emos is like blaming the blues for them.
    Music expressing sorrow or anger has existed a long time and is often much more meaningful than happy poppy songs.

    That doesn't mean you should go and wallow in your self pity, dress in all black, wear eye makeup and cut yourself while in the fetal position because life is just too cruel.

    To quote the man, bill hicks:
    “Because you know if you play New Kids on the Block albums backwards they sound better. "Oh come on, Bill, they're the New Kids, don't pick on them, they're so good and they're so clean cut and they're such a good image for the children." **** that! When did mediocrity and banality become a good image for your children? I want my children to listen to people who ****ing ROCKED! I don't care if they died in puddles of their own vomit! I want someone who plays from his ****ing HEART!”

  6. #36
    DCEmu Respected souLLy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    London
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,602
    Rep Power
    91

    Default

    Nirvana fit into the Radiohead category for me: bands that make decent albums, are competent at what they do but are massively over-rated. I do however like Kurt's way of saying something obviously incredibly close to the bone and then saying something totally random afterwards to throw you off of the scent.

    From the alternative scene of the early to mid 90s, I think the Chili Peppers and Smashing Pumpkins were better. But all of them should be applauded for killing off hair metal.

  7. #37
    Dream Coder
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Age
    38
    Posts
    4,675
    Rep Power
    50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by souLLy View Post
    Nirvana fit into the Radiohead category for me: bands that make decent albums, are competent at what they do but are massively over-rated. I do however like Kurt's way of saying something obviously incredibly close to the bone and then saying something totally random afterwards to throw you off of the scent.

    From the alternative scene of the early to mid 90s, I think the Chili Peppers and Smashing Pumpkins were better. But all of them should be applauded for killing off hair metal.
    I agree. It's also amazing to note that the Chili peppers have been together for over 20 years. The self titled album came out in 84, and even though they weren't as ridiculously popular as they have become, they were performing when glam metal was still all the rage.

    It's almost the most interesting little point that while the big sound rock metal people were ODing on coke (as was the style of the age) people like the peppers and nirvana were up to their necks in heroine. It really shows the big transition in the times.

    Drugs via music:
    40s-50s Morphine (Hank Williams)
    50s-60s Bennies
    60s-70s LSD (Hendrix)
    70s-80s Coke (way too many)
    80s-90s Heroine
    90s - ? i unno... e?

    Yea, I thought I had much more to say about that, and I probably could, but ya'll see the point.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •