Reply With Quotebecause they will not get enough money working these games on psp
Results 1 to 10 of 16
Thread: why doesnt squareenix
-
June 6th, 2007, 05:08 #1DCEmu Newbie
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 96
- Rep Power
- 0
why doesnt squareenix
port games as good as ff 10 or make new ones that good for the psp instead of the crap no one cares about anymore or beat already like star ocean or ff1/ff2? I mean the only people that can enjoy ff10 are people with a ps2 unlike the others they keep making for the psp based on ps1 tech.
-
June 6th, 2007, 13:55 #2still alive
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 10,509
- Rep Power
- 0
-
June 6th, 2007, 20:13 #3DCEmu Regular
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Age
- 45
- Posts
- 486
- Rep Power
- 69
First off, FF 10 barely fit onto a DVD, much less compressing it to a UMD. That's not too likely to happen. Even redoing FF 7-9 would require 2 UMD's or so.
My main problems with the re-releases of FF1 and 2 for the PSP are...
a) They fit both onto a single CD for the PSX, why separate UMDs for the PSP version?
b) They've got a 3-d graphics engine in place for the FF III DS remake, why not just apply it to FF 1 and 2?
-
June 6th, 2007, 23:27 #4still alive
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 10,509
- Rep Power
- 0
Was the PlayStation version a remake or a port?a) They fit both onto a single CD for the PSX, why separate UMDs for the PSP version?
-
June 6th, 2007, 23:36 #5DCEmu Regular
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- London
- Posts
- 494
- Rep Power
- 95
Port
-
June 6th, 2007, 23:53 #6DCEmu Regular
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Age
- 45
- Posts
- 486
- Rep Power
- 69
The PSX version was a remake. It had the higher-quality sprites and music that were later in Dawn of Souls.
Hell, come to think of it, Dawn of Souls was 1&2 on a single GBA cart!
-
June 7th, 2007, 01:34 #7DCEmu Regular
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- London
- Posts
- 494
- Rep Power
- 95
The psp versio has vastly updated graphics though.
-
June 7th, 2007, 01:46 #8PSP User
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Out of this world
- Posts
- 465
- Rep Power
- 72
Final Fantasy X sucks. The name sounds cool though (Final Fantasy EKS
). Want a real FF? Play FF6 now that's something that has to be ported 
-
June 7th, 2007, 05:06 #9DCEmu Rookie
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Sherbrooke, Qc, Canada
- Posts
- 243
- Rep Power
- 68
Ps1 version of FF 1 & 2 were obviously remakes.
They agreed to release FF 1, 2 and 3 on the Wonderswan Color even if that handled future was incertain.. Also, sony helped so much SE in the past.. that quite cheap of them to release only thoses re-remake on psp.because they will not get enough money working these games on psp
Ya, and PSP hardware could give so much more out of it. There is certainly a exclusivity issue with nintendo for the Matrix Engine.They've got a 3-d graphics engine in place for the FF III DS remake, why not just apply it to FF 1 and 2?
-
June 7th, 2007, 07:34 #10DCEmu Regular
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Age
- 45
- Posts
- 486
- Rep Power
- 69
They did. It was re-released on the GBA not too long ago.
Originally Posted by Cloud_35
Final Fantasy X sucks. The name sounds cool though (Final Fantasy EKS). Want a real FF? Play FF6 now that's something that has to be ported
Here's my Squeenix dream:
They get done with the White Engine and FFXIII. They say to themselves: "We have this wonderful graphics engine now that we've designed to be the basis for a bunch of our new games. Why don't we re-release all of the previous Final Fantasy games on one or two Blu-Ray discs using the new White engine?"
.... well.... A man can DREAM, can't he?
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks