EvilSeph just owned every member of DCemu![]()
And it seemed like a well rounded and informed opinion, kind of like the article that was removed, unlike the article that made front page![]()
It most certainly does not happen "all the time" as you say. Usually the only times when it happens is: A) if the original post was inaccurate, B) if there was a continuing development that did not warrant a completely new post, or C) If wraggster wants it.
As stated above, the biggest rule on the site, that goes largely unwritten is "if wraggster wants". If he so wishes, he will add, remove, or edit anything to any news post period. He has the final say in what goes into news posts. I have written up a post, submitted it, and had him remove it the next day replacing it with his own that was identical just to change the site it linked to.It's not confusing - it's done to most of the low quality news articles.
Ahem. The news article in quesiton was dumped and replaced by an article written by wraggster.
See the original post which has been quoted here and compare it to what wraggster edited in.
None of those things though are site policy, and there is a big difference. You will most usually not see any frontpage news altered after it is posted (with the small exception of maybe broken posts or poor spelling or whatnot). ESPECIALLY if it was posted by wraggster himself (no staff is allowed to modify his news posts).
And yet, your'e still here. The site has had it's priorities fixed for a LONG time, and they are first and foremost to report news quickly and to gather news posted elsewhere (as many other news reposting sites do). If you wanted the better post up, you should have goten it submitted before the 3 liner, plain and simple. If you don't like the way that works then too bad. I suggest for the future that if you want nice long things posted, to get whatever news it is written up fast and before anything else is submitted lest the effort be wasted.After, before, first - it doesn't matter. Leaving a 3-liner on the front page is damaging to DCEmu.
I don't see how that is vital information at all. All of that has been boilerplate for any downgrader either since the start of at least for the past few months. If there were ACTUAL key information left out like: "Don't use this on european psps or they will explode" that would of course be edited in. "Downgraders have the chance of bricking your machine" is not key information by any means.Also, the article in question did NOT contain KEY information. Would that not warrant an article edit? See here for an example.
I will have you know I take personal and professional (although amateur as I'm not paid in any way of course) offense to that. I have never been a member of the news staff, nothing I have said has been incorrect, I have never posted any news that would come into question in this debate at all, and I have not defended any individual.So, what I see is members of the news staff defending each other (and their work)...with inaccurate arguments.
What you seem to be doing is condemning all of the current newsposters (other than wraggster of course, who you seem to think makes great news posts) for not adhering to what YOU think the policies of the news forums should be. What you should instead look to do, is try to change the policy, which is wraggster's, and has been that of the site since the beginning (I was here) of speed of news reposting vs writing our own proper articles.
That is, by far, the most f*cking retarded thing I've ever seen someone say in regards to posting news.
You don't take the sh*tty three-line post over a thought-out, more professional article just because it was first. This just proves that you value quantity over quality, and that's what keeps you a tier or two below the best gaming news sites around.
You value quickly-written garbage over real writing, and that's f*cking retarded.
Mine was three paragraphs. Frontpage it!
good god Jordan, that was pretty funny for you :P
You seem to say that as if the second post had all sorts of magical stuff that is NEWS in it. What the later post added was: the warnings that are affixed to every downgrader related thing, instructions on how to use the new downgrader, links for places to buy the game, and a donation link. ALL of these things are relegated specifically for guides or tutorials on how to use the exploit, NOT in a front page news piece on it's release.
Whenever a new version of an emulator, homebrew game, app, etc comes out, the news post most certainly doesn't describe how to install it, the controls in game, where you can buy games for it, or any other sort of info like that. What is given is the new news on the product.
In short: what was posted was not missing any information, was posted first, and was already replied to while the second was ridiculously long, had a lot of superfluous information, and was posted later.
I don't see where the problem is other than you regular users can't see the removed post. For reference, here it is in all it's lengthy mostly pointless glory:
Do you really think it would be fitting to have that spamming up the front page, not to mention the fact that it doesn't add any relevant NEWS to the topic, it simply includes a full Operators Guide along with the actual news.
PS: For reference, both the original and this post were directly copy+pasted (content-wise) from noobz, the news post that you see on our site was taken from their news page, as makes sense. This was a more in depth article that they had on it that was accessible away from their front page (for obvious reasons). Also to note, both of them link directly to where all the extraneous info can be found.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks