/ / M O B I L E

**Amnesiac** · August 3rd, 2007, 09:29

Some of my older tags, I go by TempesT on other forums.

CnC any/all

**Tetris999** · August 6th, 2007, 02:19

you beat me with all that depth you have in your signatures

but what would make MANY of your sigs more dynamic is not to stick to a color scheme, a sig with different colors and that depth you are good at really make a sig kick ass

dont get me wrong therye all pretty good

**JPJunkie** · August 6th, 2007, 09:45

Some of them are really good:thumbup:

**Cheyzak** · August 6th, 2007, 12:24

Colors are mono and some of them need a clean focal. Their pretty good all in all. Hey I think I saw you on other forums. Do you visit tech-gfx or PR?

**Amnesiac** · August 6th, 2007, 13:50

Nope sorry, wrong TempesT, apparently there are a few of them running around. But myeh, that isnt me, no :P

Also, I'm afraid we must have different definitions of "focal points" because they all have a focal point

**Cheyzak** · August 6th, 2007, 14:11

Originally Posted by Amnesiac

Nope sorry, wrong TempesT, apparently there are a few of them running around. But myeh, that isnt me, no :P

Also, I'm afraid we must have different definitions of "focal points" because they all have a focal point

Look for example the third sig. The colors and effects are taking away from the focal so it's not clear.

**Amnesiac** · August 7th, 2007, 09:13

I guess I see where you're coming from ;P although that's the first time I've ever gotten a crit about focal points so I was thrown for a loop. Thanks for the comment.. any others?