Medal Of Honor: Vanguard or Call Of Duty 3 ·

**gdf** · August 11th, 2007, 16:32

cod is better than moh now but moh was awesome back in the day, it all went downhill from rising sun...

**Triv1um** · August 11th, 2007, 19:11

No CoD3 sucks BADLY.

Im a big MOH guy (used to be ranked 8th on MOH heroes (psp)).

I have CoD3 on ps3 and it is wank.

**gdf** · August 13th, 2007, 15:36

anything is wank on ps3 lol.

cod3 isn't as good because it wasn't made by infinity ward. they made the first 2 which are awesome.

**Accordion** · August 13th, 2007, 19:06

don't bother with COD3 on the Wii either.

serious frame rate issues occur very often, and sometimes appear to be some form of single player lagging because the enemies seem to have no trouble killing you while you look around at 1fps.

game should never have been released.

***Layzie*** · August 14th, 2007, 00:31

hm from wat i see cod3 itself isnt such a good game.

if this is so then wat game would everyone personally reccomend my first ever game should be after red steel?

any game i dont mind for genre or watever....but it has to have career mode or suttin lol i cant play multiplayer all day

**Triv1um** · August 14th, 2007, 00:43

I really enjoyed Zelda.

I hate the wii, but Zelda I loved.

**SnesR0X** · August 14th, 2007, 02:13

Resident evil 4, is by far my favourite game on the Wii. If you don't already have it, get it.

**Broadus** · August 15th, 2007, 07:37

Man, what kinda crazy poll is this? Vanguard's much more cheaply produced and has no real multiplayer aside from four-player in-house crap. Now, I like Vanguard, but it feels more like a fan map pack to a Call of Duty game than an actual Medal of Honor game. Besides, they're still going to release Airborne, which is supposed to have more expensive production values. Not that money is everything, but it should have the quality of real Medal of Honor games.
If you were going to get a Medal of Honor game, I'd recommend Pacific Assault or Allied Assault if you're going with PC, or European Assault if you want a good single player shooter on a console.
But if you want a good console single player and multiplayer game and you're choosing between Call of Duty and Medal of Honor, you'll be better off with one of the three console Call of Duty games, which all have great single players and 16-player multiplayers (Call of Duty 3 has 24 on XBOX 360 and probably other systems, but 16 on PS2).

Why are you so pressured to only get one game, anyway?

**SnesR0X** · August 15th, 2007, 09:56

Originally Posted by Broadus

Man, what kinda crazy poll is this? Vanguard's much more cheaply produced and has no real multiplayer aside from four-player in-house crap. Now, I like Vanguard, but it feels more like a fan map pack to a Call of Duty game than an actual Medal of Honor game. Besides, they're still going to release Airborne, which is supposed to have more expensive production values. Not that money is everything, but it should have the quality of real Medal of Honor games.
If you were going to get a Medal of Honor game, I'd recommend Pacific Assault or Allied Assault if you're going with PC, or European Assault if you want a good single player shooter on a console.
But if you want a good console single player and multiplayer game and you're choosing between Call of Duty and Medal of Honor, you'll be better off with one of the three console Call of Duty games, which all have great single players and 16-player multiplayers (Call of Duty 3 has 24 on XBOX 360 and probably other systems, but 16 on PS2).

Why are you so pressured to only get one game, anyway?

Well, some people do not have endless load of cash you see.