Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: EA caught fiddling Wikipedia

                  
   
  1. #11
    DCEmu Regular Adrenalin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    477
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    lol pwned.
    stupid EA

  2. #12
    CONSOLE HOARDER VampDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Seinan Eikoku
    Posts
    5,499
    Blog Entries
    4
    Rep Power
    135

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JKKDARK View Post
    Yes it's possible
    I think anything is possible on Wikipedia, as Wikipedia are always monitoring content and making sure that nobody has maliciously altered documents and other forms of unjust editing. Wikipedia at times section off subjects, which I can only presume that they restore the original document from the server and possibly have a small team to comb through the original and the edited document and make the necessary changes to correct the updated original document.

  3. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    LOOK AT MY GIRL SHES HOT ^_^
    Posts
    461
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cap'n 1time View Post
    I disagree. Wikipedia works, and the proof is in the fact that companies that try to alter their image on wikipedia (Microsoft, EA, etc) always get caught and take it up the ass when they do get caught.
    opps, you misinterpreted what i said. Don't get me wrong i use wikipedia quite often, i meant that ANYONE shouldn't be able to edit it just like that. Still that is just my opinoin. I respect yours. and remember what i said earlier, to me peolpe who are angry at somthing tend to go to wkikpedia to miss use something there like saying you (cap'n'1time) suck or somthing of the sort.

  4. #14
    DCEmu Legend Cap'n 1time's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Right behind you...
    Age
    37
    Posts
    4,547
    Rep Power
    121

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Shadow View Post
    opps, you misinterpreted what i said. Don't get me wrong i use wikipedia quite often, i meant that ANYONE shouldn't be able to edit it just like that. Still that is just my opinoin. I respect yours. and remember what i said earlier, to me peolpe who are angry at somthing tend to go to wkikpedia to miss use something there like saying you (cap'n'1time) suck or somthing of the sort.
    I still disagree... well, sort of. While it would be awesome if we had 100% accurate super genius robots writing wikipedia articles that isnt going to happen no matter what. It's hard to find enough people who would donate so much time on topics they have little or no interest of to such a project with no pay. I do think it would help if citations were always required and approved BEFORE the article goes public.

  5. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    LOOK AT MY GIRL SHES HOT ^_^
    Posts
    461
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cap'n 1time View Post
    I still disagree... well, sort of. While it would be awesome if we had 100% accurate super genius robots writing wikipedia articles that isnt going to happen no matter what. It's hard to find enough people who would donate so much time on topics they have little or no interest of to such a project with no pay. I do think it would help if citations were always required and approved BEFORE the article goes public.
    AH good you got me their, i like your idea for the citation. Maybe its something they should apply.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •