Harry Potters Blood

[iamharrypotter]

Swimkid, this is a discussion forum, hence we are discussing subjects. If you don't like the posts, don't bother reading them. And definitely don't bother posting useless suggestions, like "read the book again".

I don't want to read the book again, I want to discuss, which is what this forum is for.

[Swimkid]

anyway harry couldn't be killed by voldy since tome 4 and voldi wanted to kill him himself ,so hary couldn't die...
it's a bit stupid...

ps in the forest hrry did'nt die because of the bllod connection , not because he was owwner of the elder wand(because he really wanted to die this time)

Not really. The wand recognized Harry as the true owner and the spell "backfired" even though it hit Harry it only killed the part of Voldemort inside of him. So in the castle. It backfired again and since the only thing there was to be backfired on was Voldy... he died. YAY the end.

[padfoots]

Not really. The wand recognized Harry as the true owner and the spell "backfired" even though it hit Harry it only killed the part of Voldemort inside of him. So in the castle. It backfired again and since the only thing there was to be backfired on was Voldy... he died. YAY the end.

i don't agree. in the forest, the fact that harry was master of the elder wand did [COLOR="black"]nothing[/COLOR]because harry wanted to die(if he had wanted to survive the curse would have done nothing like the crusio curse)

"i didn't defend myself i meant to let him kill me!
-and that ,said dumbledore, will have made all the difference"

so he didn't die only because of the blood connection( in the forest)

in the castle,voldy 's curse never hit harry!(though he wouldn't have die if it had)harry's curse overpowered his curse and voldy received the 2curses(so he died and lost the wand)

p.s it's my point of view i don't say it has got to be true but it's seems to me more valuable than yours.
anyway if i didn't convince y ,explain your view better pls

[notreallyanaccount]

HP for the win