lol
what a claim, hopefully they stay true to their word, havent played a wii yet, but from what i've seen the ps3's sixaxis controller sucks in terms of motion sensing, perhaps the eye toy can make up for it xD
via Computer and Video Games
The PS3's ability to track the position of an object in 3D space using the new Eye Toy offers up more potential for motion-sensing gaming than the Wii Remote, Sony told CVG yesterday.
Eye Toy card battle game, Eye of Judgement, boasts some pretty impressive optical recognition technology that not only identifies a card (from a selection of hundreds) and summons the right monster, but it can track the movement of that card - including its distance from the camera and tilt orientation - and keep that monster positioned correctly on it.
Game director Kazuhito Miyaki told CVG: "All of the different Eye Toy games that we've made so far and the wide range [of gameplay] that we have delivered shows that the camera isn't the key device, it's what we do with it that's important."When asked how this compared to the motion tracking opportunities offered by the Wii Remote, he went on the say: "In Eye of Judgement it's all about summoning the creatures. With other games it'll be about creating a whole different dynamic so, in a way, you could say there is much more potential and ability in our technology."
lol
what a claim, hopefully they stay true to their word, havent played a wii yet, but from what i've seen the ps3's sixaxis controller sucks in terms of motion sensing, perhaps the eye toy can make up for it xD
well i suppose nintendo can make an eye toy too, yeah that just pissed on your bonfire sony, and why did you implement six-axis personally it feels tacked on and needs scraping i would swap six-axis for rumble anyday
and basil that link to that steal your soul thing dont work, just givin u the heads up
why do sony keep saying **** like this
"killzone 2 will be better than halo wooo!"
"the wii is a toy wooo!"
"the eye toy is better than the wiimote wooo!"
They should be trying to sell there £450 mess not trying to bash the wii or 360
:rofl:
anything is better than halo, but sony hasnt said its better than halo.
all games consoles are toys
actually if used correctly the eyetoy can offer more immersive gameplay. For all of the Wii sports games could be done on the eyetoy [ps2 or ps3], the software can track multiple colours at on time, two wrist bands would provide perfect motion tracking.
the PS3 does not cost £450... and never has.
the PS3 starter pack is £425 including two games and an extra controller. that means the console costs £310. still not cheap i agree, but dont talk nonsense.
i cant wait 4 the new eye toy to come out ... but on ps3 it can fit loads more mini games on it ... and things like that
no the ps3 does cost £450 it says so right here in my argos catalog
sony said some thing about beating the top fps with killzone 2 (and the top fps was halo 2)
the eye top sucks why would i want to jump up and down 7 times just to get the game to respond (yes i have the ps2 eye toy)
yes lots of things are better than halo but killzone is not one of them.
argos?
argos?
really?
the highly respected computer games retailer argos?
the same argos which repeatedly advertises correct information?
The automatically updating hard-copy of the catalog? thats completely void of connection to current information?
not following a much publicized RRP?
i highly doubt that.
man i hate talking to sony fanboys, you said it was £310 and i proved you wrong
here it is at £450
http://www.gamestop.com/product.asp?product%5Fid=020071
there i proved you wrong again
here it is at £400
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/...amazonstore-21
and there i proved you wrong again!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks