Thats just crazy hey.
I can understand the native indian drug thing somewhat if they had been doing it long before white settlement, but what does harassing people to stop a video game have to do with Christian heritage? It doesn't have exclusive rights to opposing violence, nor a history clear of inflicting it more so than most other groups.
Surely the majority of people of any religion (or atheists) wouldn't approve of the actions of almost any violent game/movie if conducted in the real world.
I guess when you set up your side as 'good' and the other 'evil' (whether that is true or not) it does make it a lot more accepted in both games and real life. The uproar these days seems to be much larger over games set in a populated city vs a warzone with only soldiers.
But saying I want to go out an kill a hooker after playing GTA because its a 'murder simulator' is as crazy as saying I'll try to take on the Chinese army after playing BF2.
Does Christianity give him a unique ignorance as to the difference between real and make believe, or just a right to be more offended then others and to push that offense on the entire population?
I wouldn't have thought a religious person themselves would make the former argument.
Religion should have no bearing on law and politics (I'm well aware removing its influence entirely is a exercise in futility), but terrorists that justify their wrongs by religion aren't let off and termed 'persons of strong religious conviction leading to well-intentioned mass suffering/death'.
At what point level of severity do they no longer get their own legislated double standard?
Bookmarks