Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Michael Bay on Warner's move to Blu-ray

                  
   
  1. #1
    Won Hung Lo wraggster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Nottingham, England
    Age
    53
    Posts
    141,470
    Blog Entries
    3209
    Rep Power
    50

    ps3 Michael Bay on Warner's move to Blu-ray

    Well another studio down. Maybe I was right? Blu ray is just better. HD will die a slow death. It's what I predicted a year ago. Now with Warner's down for the count with Blu Ray. That makes it easier for Wal-Mart to push Blu Ray. And whatever Wal-Mart pushes - wins. Hd better start giving out those $120 million dollars checks to stay alive. Maybe they can give me some so I can give it to my Make-A-Wish charity, just to shut me up. Have faith people Transformers will come out in Blu-ray one day!

    http://www.shootfortheedit.com/forum...=9716#post9716

  2. #2
    DCEmu Rookie
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Right now, Czech, usually UK.
    Posts
    137
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wraggster View Post
    Well another studio down. Maybe I was right? Blu ray is just better. HD will die a slow death. It's what I predicted a year ago. Now with Warner's down for the count with Blu Ray. That makes it easier for Wal-Mart to push Blu Ray. And whatever Wal-Mart pushes - wins. Hd better start giving out those $120 million dollars checks to stay alive. Maybe they can give me some so I can give it to my Make-A-Wish charity, just to shut me up. Have faith people Transformers will come out in Blu-ray one day!

    http://www.shootfortheedit.com/forum...=9716#post9716
    I must have missed the report but I dont get how you can say blueray is better.
    Disks cost more to make, no backward compatibility, very stupid DRM.... HD allways seemed to make more sense to me.

  3. #3
    DCEmu Old Pro bah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,671
    Rep Power
    80

    Default

    The only reason I can see movie studios thinking Blu-Ray is better is that is has the extra layer of DRM.

    They use the same codecs, Bay is just talking out his ass as usual. Go back to school and learn how to direct a film. Throwing FX at crap isn't directing.

    Everyone is talking about the HD camp paying of studios to go blu-ray only, It seems to me all this pro Blu-Ray talk is either due to the extra DRM or its sony who's paying people off.

    Its a crappy day for those who want a cheap, high capacity optical media for PC backups.

    EDIT: What's with DCemu today, it seems to be working ok then goes seriously slow, then back to ok again. All other sites are fine for me.
    Last edited by bah; January 6th, 2008 at 11:04.

  4. #4
    DCEmu Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,355
    Rep Power
    82

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bah View Post
    The only reason I can see movie studios thinking Blu-Ray is better is that is has the extra layer of DRM.

    They use the same codecs, Bay is just talking out his ass as usual. Go back to school and learn how to direct a film. Throwing FX at crap isn't directing.

    Everyone is talking about the HD camp paying of studios to go blu-ray only, It seems to me all this pro Blu-Ray talk is either due to the extra DRM or its sony who's paying people off.

    Its a crappy day for those who want a cheap, high capacity optical media for PC backups.

    EDIT: What's with DCemu today, it seems to be working ok then goes seriously slow, then back to ok again. All other sites are fine for me.
    No the Blu-Ray Disc Association has played fair. Microsoft, in fact, payed out Paramount to drop Blu-Ray in favor of HD-DVD. And, from Michael Bay says, Microsoft didn't do it because the company though HD-DVD was better, but because Microsoft needs time to develop its download service, in essence, buying themselves time.

  5. #5
    PS Beta Tester & Mod DPyro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Right Behind You!
    Posts
    2,742
    Rep Power
    86

    Default

    LoL do you really think Sony can afford to pay people off right now?

  6. #6
    DCEmu Old Pro Elven6's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,158
    Rep Power
    75

    Default

    They did, Warner, do you think a company that made their movies better on HD DVD then Blu Ray decided one day they were wrong? The reason their blu ray releases didn't have that was because they couldn't support it. Sony obiously paid them out, F9z, that is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, stop talking like Bay.

  7. #7
    PS3 User Napalm-Death's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Bronx, NY
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,241
    Rep Power
    89

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Elven6 View Post
    They did, Warner, do you think a company that made their movies better on HD DVD then Blu Ray decided one day they were wrong? The reason their blu ray releases didn't have that was because they couldn't support it. Sony obiously paid them out, F9z, that is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, stop talking like Bay.
    The companies go where they feel they'll make the most money, Sony didn't buy them out. If you looked at the Bluray vs HD-DVD chart, you'd realize that Bluray is outselling HD-DVD...

    EDIT: Here, do you see HD-DVD outselling Bluray on this chart? I don't.



    Thanks to DCErgo for originally posting it.
    Last edited by Napalm-Death; January 6th, 2008 at 17:20.

  8. #8
    DCEmu Reviewer Shadowblind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    PR:SB End
    Posts
    3,796
    Rep Power
    115

    Default

    Naturally, people are going to buy the HD format for which they have the player. Therefore, its only expected that people buy far more Blu-Ray then HD-DVD, since the 8 mil (correct me) sold PS3 is, well, 8 million. if MS had originally put an HDDVD player into their 360, given its year headstart, the ball may have been in HDDVD's court.

    But its too late for them. I guess its for the better though, a 360 would've been $600. :/

  9. #9
    PS3 User Gizmo356's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Age
    33
    Posts
    1,756
    Rep Power
    124

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Elven6 View Post
    They did, Warner, do you think a company that made their movies better on HD DVD then Blu Ray decided one day they were wrong? The reason their blu ray releases didn't have that was because they couldn't support it. Sony obiously paid them out, F9z, that is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, stop talking like Bay.
    Then why did they say they weren't paid?

  10. #10
    DCEmu Old Pro
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sheffield, UK
    Posts
    1,629
    Rep Power
    94

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by $n!pR View Post
    LoL do you really think Sony can afford to pay people off right now?
    Actually, many people forget that Sony have other enterprises other than PS3's and PSP's - and the PS3 is far from a failure - it was quite hard to get hold of one at one point near Christmas.

    However, I don't think they were bought. If you take a look at that chart, it just shows they feel that there's a greater market in selling Blu-Ray disks, as it seems more people have players.

    Cloudy

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •