inferior graphics? So it means the Saturn wasn't a fifth generation console for you? Because the Saturn didn't have the true 3D power like the Nintendo 64 and PlayStation.
Who cares about Sega? All their consoles were failures.
The whole reason their not making hardware anymore is because they can't make a successful console.
EDIT: I should say, the only console they made that was semi-successful is the Sega Genesis.
Last edited by DPyro; February 8th, 2008 at 03:20.
Atari also only made 1 successful console, then proceeded to run their company into the ground.
But you said:
$n!pR immortal words.Originally Posted by $n!pR
Explain that![]()
I fully back Capello for England manager because he isn't afraid to drop some of the big gun England players. The players are paid far to much money so playing for the country means nothing weather they play well or not they just think of the big money at the end of the week.
PSN ID: splodger15
Uh no not owned. The PS3 is successful unlike the Saturn. Having sold 10.5 million consoles in its first year on the market.
Don't bring up "similar" situations to avoid my discussion; it only shows that you know I owned your dumb german tart ass and that you have nothing else to say about it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks